1995
DOI: 10.1016/0165-1161(95)90010-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The improved Allium/Vicia root tip micronucleus assay for clastogenicity of environmental pollutants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
128
0
11

Year Published

1998
1998
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 273 publications
(149 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
5
128
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…The centric fragments or laggards being omitted from the nucleus proper during mitosis further lead to development of micronuclei. Such a rise in micronuclei is also suggestive of the abilities of test chemicals in producing different types of CAs (Ma et al, 1995). The results from this study showed a statistically significant difference in the frequencies of micronuclei induction in mice bone marrow exposed to AFB1 when compared to the control.…”
Section: Micronuclei Inductionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…The centric fragments or laggards being omitted from the nucleus proper during mitosis further lead to development of micronuclei. Such a rise in micronuclei is also suggestive of the abilities of test chemicals in producing different types of CAs (Ma et al, 1995). The results from this study showed a statistically significant difference in the frequencies of micronuclei induction in mice bone marrow exposed to AFB1 when compared to the control.…”
Section: Micronuclei Inductionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…The in-duction of laggards could be attributed to the failure of spindle apparatus to organize and function in a normal way (Patil and Bhat 1992). As a rule, micronucleus formation is the result of acentric fragments or laggards being excluded from the nucleus during mitosis (Ma et al 1995). The induction of micronucleus and multipolarity indicate the mutagenic potential of the applied polyamines.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The whole tip meriste-. matic and F1 regions was preferred to only F1 as w x suggested by Ma et al 16 to avoid to introduce an error in micronucleus estimation due to mistakes in choosing the region to be analysed. Scoring for counting a MN was based on generally accepted w x criteria for MN identification 17 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%