2008
DOI: 10.1186/1471-244x-8-68
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The importance of the concepts of disaster, catastrophe, violence, trauma and barbarism in defining posttraumatic stress disorder in clinical practice

Abstract: Background: Several terms in the scientific literature about posttraumatic stress disorder are used with different meanings in studies conducted by different authors. Words such as trauma, violence, catastrophe, disaster and barbarism are often used vaguely or confusingly, and their meanings change in different articles. The lack of conceptual references for these expressions complicates the organization of literature. Furthermore, the absence of clear concepts may be an obstacle to clinical treatment because … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
8

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
8
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…If this is the case, it is possible to conclude from the evidence that the event plays an integral role in the course and symptom profile of the disorder and that the current criteria do not effectively capture those aspects of the event which cause such distress. Many authors agree that the classification of traumatic events is underdeveloped (e.g., Luz et al, 2011) and acknowledge the need for a standardised description (e.g., Braga et al, 2008;Long & Elhai, 2009). Therefore, although the Stressor Criterion may require revision, the etiological connection between the event and the resulting symptoms warrants being retained as the event is likely to hold the key to the best course of treatment, and thus adjustment and recovery.…”
Section: How Else Could These Results Be Interpreted?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If this is the case, it is possible to conclude from the evidence that the event plays an integral role in the course and symptom profile of the disorder and that the current criteria do not effectively capture those aspects of the event which cause such distress. Many authors agree that the classification of traumatic events is underdeveloped (e.g., Luz et al, 2011) and acknowledge the need for a standardised description (e.g., Braga et al, 2008;Long & Elhai, 2009). Therefore, although the Stressor Criterion may require revision, the etiological connection between the event and the resulting symptoms warrants being retained as the event is likely to hold the key to the best course of treatment, and thus adjustment and recovery.…”
Section: How Else Could These Results Be Interpreted?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The objective of qualitative studies [36-38] is to explore conceptual aspects [39] and understand different meanings and nuances of these apparent contradictions between clinical research and controlled methodologies. The present study aims to detect how Brazilian OHS perceive transgenerational transmission of their parents’ experiences in the Holocaust.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A palavra "violência" origina-se do latim e tem dois signifi cados: violentia, que signifi ca veemência, ato apaixonado e sem controle, e violare, que signifi ca infração ou violação 3 . Interessa-nos aqui a violência intencional como violação, que vai além da forma física, que impede a realização humana.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified