The importance of political participation for sustained capitalist development

Goodell, Grace E.

doi:10.1017/s0003975600004355

Cited by 7 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 3 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Perdagangan akan tumbuh dalam iklim demokrasi yang benar, yakni mencakup kebebasan, informasi yang bisa diakses secara bebas, dan hak properti yang aman dari kekuasaan negara yang sewenang-wenang. Goodell (1985) berpendapat bahwa pemerintah otokratis menghasilkan kondisi ekonomi yang tidak dapat diprediksi karena tidak ada pemeriksaan pada kemampuan otokrasi untuk mengubah "aturan main" kapan saja. Di bawah kondisi yang tidak dapat diprediksi, pengusaha akan ragu untuk melakukan perdagangan dan berinvestasi (Goodell, 1985).…”

Section: Demokrasi Dan Perdaganganunclassified

See 1 more Smart Citation

Dampak Demokrasi terhadap Perdagangan di Negara-Negara Berpendapatan Menengah dan Tinggi Asia [Impacts of Democracy on Trade Activity in Asia's Middle and High Income Countries]

Tambunan

2020

j. ekonomi & kebijak. publik

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A democratic system is a way as the basis for supporting the trade process among countries. Increased international trade can generate economic growth. But some parties claim that democracy actually would hinder or even threatens the trade flows. That dynamic situation is increasingly apparent in middle and high-income countries. This study aims to determine whether democracy impacts on trade, especially in Asia. Using the Gravity Model, this study focuses on 11 countries divided by their income from period 2009 to 2018. The high-income countries chosen in this study are Japan, Singapore, South Korea, and Brunei Darussalam, and middleincome countries are China, Indonesia, Malaysia, Thailand, the Philippines, Pakistan, and India. Using the panel data regression method, the results of this study states that democracy in the Asia Countries affected trade significantly. It was also found that trade in high-income countries was not affected by democracy, while trade in low-income countries was strongly influenced by democracy.

show abstract

Section: Demokrasi Dan Perdaganganunclassified

“…Goodell (1985) berpendapat bahwa pemerintah otokratis menghasilkan kondisi ekonomi yang tidak dapat diprediksi karena tidak ada pemeriksaan pada kemampuan otokrasi untuk mengubah "aturan main" kapan saja. Di bawah kondisi yang tidak dapat diprediksi, pengusaha akan ragu untuk melakukan perdagangan dan berinvestasi (Goodell, 1985).…”

Section: Demokrasi Dan Perdaganganunclassified

Dampak Demokrasi terhadap Perdagangan di Negara-Negara Berpendapatan Menengah dan Tinggi Asia [Impacts of Democracy on Trade Activity in Asia's Middle and High Income Countries]

Tambunan

2020

j. ekonomi & kebijak. publik

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The misuse of state power in authoritarian regimes creates problems in terms of credibility. Goodell (1985) and Hays et al (2003) argue that autocratic regimes generate unpredictable economic conditions because there is no check on the autocracy's ability to change the "rules of the game" at any time. The model by Calvo and Mendoza (2000) and subsequent models of currency crises (see e.g., Banerjee 1992) are also suggestive here.…”

Section: Democracy and The Propensity To Renegementioning

confidence: 99%

The Politics of Exchange Rates in Developing Countries

2006

Contributions to Economics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…In Barrington Moore's famous phrase: "No bourgeois, no democracy" (Moore 1966, p. 418). Two theoretical traditions have staked out this position: Marxism, emphasizing the role of capitalist self-interest in the making of "bourgeois democracy" ever since the Communist manifesto (Marx andEngels [1848] 1978, p. 475;Lenin [1905Lenin [ ] 1975b; and liberal pluralism, emphasizing the congruity of economic and political "freedoms" (Hayek 1944;Goodell 1985). Recent case studies demonstrating the role of the bourgeoisie in democratization include Cardoso (1986) and Seidman (1994, pp.…”

Section: Class Actors and Democratizationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Intellectuals and Democratization, 1905–1912 and 1989–1996

Kurzman

Leahey

2004

American Journal of Sociology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article bridges the gap in studies of the social bases of democratization between qualitative studies focused on social groups and quantitative studies focused on national characteristics. Qualitative historical evidence suggests the importance of classes-in particular, the emerging class of intellectuals-in the wave of democratizations in the decade before World War I. Quantitative cross-national data on a more recent wave of democratizations, from 1989 to 1996, confirm these findings. Models using direct maximum-likelihood estimation find that the ratio of adults with higher education has a significant positive effect on change in democracy levels, as measured by two longitudinal scales (Polity IV and Polyarchy). Proxies for the working class and the middle class-candidates proposed in previous studies as the social basis of democratization-also have significant effects.

show abstract

The importance of political participation for sustained capitalist development

Abstract: Link to this article: http://journals.cambridge.org/ abstract_S0003975600004355How to cite this article: Grace Goodell (1985). The importance of political participation for sustained capitalist development.

Cited by 7 publications

References 3 publications

Dampak Demokrasi terhadap Perdagangan di Negara-Negara Berpendapatan Menengah dan Tinggi Asia [Impacts of Democracy on Trade Activity in Asia's Middle and High Income Countries]

Dampak Demokrasi terhadap Perdagangan di Negara-Negara Berpendapatan Menengah dan Tinggi Asia [Impacts of Democracy on Trade Activity in Asia's Middle and High Income Countries]

The Politics of Exchange Rates in Developing Countries

Intellectuals and Democratization, 1905–1912 and 1989–1996

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About