2012 11th International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications 2012
DOI: 10.1109/icmla.2012.135
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Importance of Outlier Relationships in Mobile Call Graphs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, vertices with a very high in-degree (e.g., customer service numbers) or out-degree (e.g., salesmen) lose that correlation. Similar conclusions are drawn by Doran et al [18], although with slightly different power law parameters (an exponent of 3.41 for the in-degree and 2.63 for the out-degree).…”
Section: Mobile Call Graph Propertiessupporting
confidence: 86%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…However, vertices with a very high in-degree (e.g., customer service numbers) or out-degree (e.g., salesmen) lose that correlation. Similar conclusions are drawn by Doran et al [18], although with slightly different power law parameters (an exponent of 3.41 for the in-degree and 2.63 for the out-degree).…”
Section: Mobile Call Graph Propertiessupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Instead, Doran et al [18] are only in partial agreement with the conclusion above. They rank edges according to their outlying behavior, i.e., how significantly the edge weight and overlap 20 deviate from the mean value in the graph, either positively or negatively.…”
Section: Mobile Call Graph Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Figure 9 plots the distribution of these durations and exhibits a clear power-tailed shape. The power tail in the distribution of call times are a common phenomenon across mobile phone datasets [14,44,8]. We therefore only consider communication between towers whose cumulative duration of all conversations fall in the top 1.5% of this distribution, where significant calling activity occurs.…”
Section: Centralitymentioning
confidence: 99%