2004
DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-6248.2004.00019.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Importance of Integrated Goal Setting: The Application of Cost-of-Capital Concepts to Private Firms

Abstract: In this article, we examine financial return, answer the question of how one knows when the return is adequate, and explore the relationship of short-and long-term returns as they relate to business health.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0
5

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
35
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…To this end, the nature of family expectations that impact business goals across the four scorecard perspectives needs to be clarified. Adams, Manners, Astrachan, and Mazzola (2004) provide useful guidance in this regard when they demonstrate the significance of financial ''aspirations'' that family members need to articulate as expectations for those leading their businesses.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…To this end, the nature of family expectations that impact business goals across the four scorecard perspectives needs to be clarified. Adams, Manners, Astrachan, and Mazzola (2004) provide useful guidance in this regard when they demonstrate the significance of financial ''aspirations'' that family members need to articulate as expectations for those leading their businesses.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Second, family managers have the possibility of substituting monetary for nonmonetary returns (Adams, Manners, Astrachan, & Mazzola, 2004): They often follow nonmonetary goals, such as independence, employment for family members, prestige (Sharma, Chrisman, & Chua, 1997). Zellweger (2006) has presented evidence that family business entrepreneurs tend to value emotional factors and consequently substitute them for the above-mentioned nonmonetary outcomes.…”
Section: Family Involvement In Management and Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The selection of a method and its justifi cation remains a scientifi c problem. The methods of the cost of equity calculation in a private organisation and their application possibilities were studied by Koeplin et al (2000), Bajaj et al (2001), Pratt, (2001, Das et al (2003), Adams et al (2004), McConaughy (2009) and many others. The problems they addressed included not only those of method applicability and measurement of variables but also the possibilities of method modifi cation and adaptation for private organisations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%