2022
DOI: 10.1242/bio.059091
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The importance of considering regulatory domains in genome-wide analyses – the nearest gene is often wrong!

Abstract: The expression of a large number of genes is regulated by regulatory elements that are located far away from their promoters. Identifying which gene is the target of a specific regulatory element or is affected by a non-coding mutation is often accomplished by assigning these regions to the nearest gene in the genome. However, this heuristic ignores key features of genome organisation and gene regulation; in that the genome is partitioned into regulatory domains, which at some loci directly coincide with the s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 133 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…GREAT tool considers a gene regulatory domain definition that takes into account a basal regulatory domain in a minimum distance upstream and downstream of a gene TSS, which is extended up to 1 Mb [ 44 ]. This definition comes in agreement with the latest genome-wide experimental and computational data [ 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 ]. Collectively, the presence of HERVs in cCREs that are based in experimental data, suggest that HERV sequences may impact, in different degree, the epigenetic regulation of 4 out 5 human genes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…GREAT tool considers a gene regulatory domain definition that takes into account a basal regulatory domain in a minimum distance upstream and downstream of a gene TSS, which is extended up to 1 Mb [ 44 ]. This definition comes in agreement with the latest genome-wide experimental and computational data [ 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 ]. Collectively, the presence of HERVs in cCREs that are based in experimental data, suggest that HERV sequences may impact, in different degree, the epigenetic regulation of 4 out 5 human genes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Since the RA stimulus exerts its differentiating effect mainly through the members of the RA-activated nuclear receptors subfamily RAR (NR1B) that encompass 3 paralogs (i.e., RAR α , RAR β and RAR γ ), the annotation of the interaction edges linking the stimulus and the regulated genes was based on the presence/absence of ChIP-seq peaks for any RAR paralogs at less than 10 kb upstream or downstream of the annotated transcription start site (TSS) in RA-stimulated ES or EC cells [ 29 , 30 ]. Although arbitrary, the chosen distance between TSS and DNA binding site for the indicated transcription regulator is relatively conservative as transcriptional effect could be exerted from greater distance up to megabases [ 31 ] and the absence of supporting peak as defined should not be interpreted as a proof of absence of any direct modulating effect. Similarly, the edges supported by physical interactions data for Sox2 and Pou5f1, or Jarid2 were extracted from [ 32 , 33 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar findings have been reported in previous studies, where CRISPR-directed gene editing targeting exons resulted in exon skipping and alterations in gene expression (Banas et al, 2022). It is also known that different cell lines can have different transcriptional regulation mechanisms, and the regulatory regions of a gene may differ depending on the cell line being used (Kang et al, 2020;Chua et al, 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%