1998
DOI: 10.1093/beheco/9.5.445
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The importance of being familiar: individual recognition and social behavior in sea trout (Salmo trutta)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
100
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 157 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
100
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, previous work with fish has shown that shoals of familiar individuals outperform randomly assembled shoals in foraging tasks (Morrell et al 2008) and display more coordinated antipredator behaviour, which is thought to lead to a reduced risk of predation (Chivers et al 1995). Social familiarity is also known to be important for mediating aggression (Utne-Palm & Hart 2000) and stabilizing group hierarchy (Hö jesjö et al 1998). Thus, one may hypothesize that female groups with reduced social familiarity due to male harassment may suffer decreased foraging success, increased predation risk and increased aggression.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, previous work with fish has shown that shoals of familiar individuals outperform randomly assembled shoals in foraging tasks (Morrell et al 2008) and display more coordinated antipredator behaviour, which is thought to lead to a reduced risk of predation (Chivers et al 1995). Social familiarity is also known to be important for mediating aggression (Utne-Palm & Hart 2000) and stabilizing group hierarchy (Hö jesjö et al 1998). Thus, one may hypothesize that female groups with reduced social familiarity due to male harassment may suffer decreased foraging success, increased predation risk and increased aggression.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Morris et al, 1995;Höjesjo et al, 1998). Rainbow trout are aggressive animals that, under some circumstances, fight each other to form and maintain dominance hierarchies or territories (Abbott and Dill, 1985).…”
Section: Fish Behaviour and Internal Representationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is abundant direct and indirect evidence that territorial vertebrates are capable of individual recognition (e.g. Catchpole & Slater 1995;Gray & Hurst 1997;Hojesjo et al 1998;Owen & Perrill 1998), so this assumption seems reasonable for this taxon, at least. The second assumption, that an individual's aggressive behaviour with one opponent can vary independently of its aggressive behaviour towards other opponents, has been amply validated in species that form dominant-subordinate relationships (review in Drews 1993), and is also likely to apply to many territorial species (Stamps 1999).…”
Section: Caveats and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%