2014
DOI: 10.1080/08941920.2014.901464
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Implementation and Sustainability of Village Conservation Agreements Around Kerinci Seblat National Park, Indonesia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ting et al (2012), highlights the principle of collective choice arrangement in community basedco-management of Baishuijiang National Natural Reserve, China, which was not running well because the implementation of community-based collaborative management was still dependent on collaborative projects funded by an international NGO. The same case is true of the village conservation agreement in Kerinci Seblat National Park, Indonesia, in which only 43% of implementation of the conservation agreement was sustained for five years as part of the Integrated development program (Wood et al, 2014). This situation also seems to be reflected in the case with LLNP, in which the performance of some local institutions implementing the CCA has decreased after the project ends.…”
Section: Collective-choice Arrangementmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Ting et al (2012), highlights the principle of collective choice arrangement in community basedco-management of Baishuijiang National Natural Reserve, China, which was not running well because the implementation of community-based collaborative management was still dependent on collaborative projects funded by an international NGO. The same case is true of the village conservation agreement in Kerinci Seblat National Park, Indonesia, in which only 43% of implementation of the conservation agreement was sustained for five years as part of the Integrated development program (Wood et al, 2014). This situation also seems to be reflected in the case with LLNP, in which the performance of some local institutions implementing the CCA has decreased after the project ends.…”
Section: Collective-choice Arrangementmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…VCAs implemented through the KS-ICDP aimed to reduce forest cover loss by providing results-based payments at the village-level. The agreements stipulated that village members would cease all deforestation and forest degradation and implement a number of sustainable livelihood initiatives with villagelevel funding from the project (World Bank 1996, Wood et al 2014. Trained local facilitators wrote VCAs in collaboration with village councils and village heads to select locally appropriate activities.…”
Section: The Kerinci-seblat Integrated Conservation and Development P...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once drafted, local authorities signed the VCA. According to standards for the project facilitation, all of the adults in a village where authorities signed a VCA were aware of how the agreement was drafted and what it stipulated (Wood et al 2014). Of the 234 villages available for selection in the KSNP landscape 1 , and the 134 villages in the 'park buffer zone,' project managers and the Indonesian Government selected 75 villages (Linkie et al 2008).…”
Section: The Kerinci-seblat Integrated Conservation and Development P...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wood et al [61] evaluated sustainability of behavioral changes associated with the agreements and development activities supported by the grants and identified determinants of success and lessons in around Kerinci Seblat National Park in Indonesia. They conducted focus-group discussions with village leaders, farmers and others involved in the ICDP and semi structured interviews with villagers, park staffs and local NGO representatives and District Head's office in three Districts.…”
Section: Silva and Mcdillmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conditional link between the obligations of the community and benefits is created by agreement with external monitoring and enforcement. If the livelihoods are directly dependent on legal and sustainable use of park resource and services, an agreement for internal control is relevant to regulate access to benefits and prevent selfish behavior [61].…”
Section: Cooperation Of Communitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%