2013
DOI: 10.3368/le.89.3.479
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Impacts of the Tax-Deferred Exchange Provision on Farm Real Estate Values

Abstract: This study examines the effects of the Section 1031 tax-deferred exchange provision on agricultural land values. The provision allows taxpayers to defer taxation for relinquished productive assets if a like-kind asset is acquired within the allotted time of 180 days. The analysis examines a set of 3,580 farm real estate transaction from 55 agricultural counties in Indiana over the period 2003-2006. Hedonic price analysis suggests that properties acquired under a like-kind exchange are associated with a 1.32% p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
1
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
5
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In the sum of these opposite effects, however, their total effects are not significant. This result contrasts with those presented by Wang (2018), Feichtinger & Salhofer (2016 and Dillard et al (2013), where both the direct and indirect effects of different government subsidies have positive impacts on the price of agricultural land.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the sum of these opposite effects, however, their total effects are not significant. This result contrasts with those presented by Wang (2018), Feichtinger & Salhofer (2016 and Dillard et al (2013), where both the direct and indirect effects of different government subsidies have positive impacts on the price of agricultural land.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 98%
“…In addition to the usual determinants of land price, spatial econometrics have been used to analyse various phenomena related to the agricultural land market, e.g., how ecosystem services, rural amenities and historical and cultural landmarks are used, valued and capitalized in markets (Ma & Swinton, 2011;Polyakov et al, 2015;Sardaro et al, 2020), to verify the role of real estate speculation and the conversion of land for urban use (Plantinga et al, 2002;Geniaux et al, 2011;Cavailhès & Thomas, 2013;Zhang & Nickerson, 2015) and to analyse the effects of environmental policies (Letort & Temesgen, 2014;Myrna et al, 2019), agricultural subsidies (Karlsson & Nilsson, 2014;Feichtinger & Salhofer, 2016) and tax exemptions on land prices (Dillard et al, 2013). Studies have also evaluated how different databases are able to capture the influences of different determinants (Lynch & Lovell, 2003;Ma & Swinton, 2012).…”
Section: Theoretical Parameters: the Spatial Dimension Of Land Pricesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the farmland sale market, several studies have already identified the existence of spatial effects. Hence, in recent years spatial process models have been favored for analyses of farmland price determinants, and substantial improvements of model fit are shown (Dillard et al, 2013; Feichtinger and Salhofer, 2016; Huang et al, 2006; Hüttel et al, 2013). For a spatially fixed asset like farmland, there are several reasons why spatial dependence can exist 4 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Real estate researches have been developed using GIS tools. Ibeas et al (2012) verified the existence of the relationship between the accessibility conditions and the dwelling real estate market through GIS analysis; Dillard et al (2013) used GIS to examine the effects of the property taxes and levies on real estate values in order to incorporate in the analysis locational variables, including surrounding land cover, proximity of urban areas, population density, transportation access, and so forth.…”
Section: Figure 1: Cycle Of Transport and Land Usementioning
confidence: 99%