2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ribaf.2014.03.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of working capital management on firm profitability in different business cycles: Evidence from Finland

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

33
115
6
55

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 246 publications
(209 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
33
115
6
55
Order By: Relevance
“…Those results contradict classical risk theory but are in line with several previous empirical studies (e.g. Gschwandtner, 2005;Enqvist et al, 2014;Pattitoni et al, 2014). The negative effect of financial risk can be explained by the risk-return paradox which states that good management practices can increase ROA and at the same time reduce financial risk (Bowman, 1980).…”
supporting
confidence: 86%
“…Those results contradict classical risk theory but are in line with several previous empirical studies (e.g. Gschwandtner, 2005;Enqvist et al, 2014;Pattitoni et al, 2014). The negative effect of financial risk can be explained by the risk-return paradox which states that good management practices can increase ROA and at the same time reduce financial risk (Bowman, 1980).…”
supporting
confidence: 86%
“…As argued by [15] if the level of ARP increases, then the sales of the company also increase. Further, high ARPs serve as quality guarantee hence giving the clients a more sustained relationship in terms of quality thus improving the company performance.…”
Section: Accounts Receivable Periodmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…ing capital management and SME performance by [2] and [15], the following variables ought to be controlled; Company age, assets tangibility, financial leverage, liquidity ratio and short-term financing.…”
Section: Sshe 2016mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The developed structure of innovative potential is presented in Table 1, which includes all six evaluation potentials, consisting of each of a set of three most important for the purposes of assessing innovative development of parameters [2]. The weight characteristic of the significance of each potential is in the range from 0 to 1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%