2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2018.03.077
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of wave energy converter arrays on wave-induced forcing in the surf zone

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other more precise methods for quantifying and modelling wave energy absorption exist and have been documented in the literature; for example, frequency dependent extraction [8,24] modelled using individual WEC devices [23] offers a more precise estimate of wave shadowing in the lee of a WEC array. However, as frequency response and WEC array layout vary from device to device, modelling these characteristics with great precision will only increase the accuracy of the modelling results if the exact devices to be deployed over the entire lifetime of the permitted array are known with certainty at the impact assessment stage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Other more precise methods for quantifying and modelling wave energy absorption exist and have been documented in the literature; for example, frequency dependent extraction [8,24] modelled using individual WEC devices [23] offers a more precise estimate of wave shadowing in the lee of a WEC array. However, as frequency response and WEC array layout vary from device to device, modelling these characteristics with great precision will only increase the accuracy of the modelling results if the exact devices to be deployed over the entire lifetime of the permitted array are known with certainty at the impact assessment stage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, scaled physical models and numerical models have been used far more extensively to determine the likely near-field (close to WEC) and far-field (close to shore) effects, respectively, of offshore wave farms. Numerical modelling of such coastal effects has been undertaken for case studies in England [6][7][8][9][10][11][12], Scotland [13], Spain [14][15][16], Portugal [17][18][19], Mexico [15], Romania [20][21][22], and the United States [23,24], as well as for generalised cases with idealised bathymetry [25][26][27].…”
Section: Effects Of Wave Energy Extraction On Wave Climatementioning
confidence: 99%
“…SWAN has also been coupled with beach morphodynamic models to evaluate WEC effects on coastal erosion [36,69]. SWAN has also been used to evaluate the effect of wave energy converter arrays on nearshore wave forcing [70]. Additional applications of SWAN have been reviewed by Ozkan et al [18].…”
Section: Wave Propagation Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, by ignoring this property of the wave energy converters we may overestimate the impacts they will have in the wave field in the lee of the arrays. See for example [34] and also the similar study [35]. On the other hand, the objective of the present work was to assess the coastal impact of various marine energy farm configurations and not to model in a very accurate way the wave energy extraction for a certain device.…”
Section: Issm Computational Platform and Case Studies 221 The Issm Interfacementioning
confidence: 99%