2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.intcom.2010.07.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of voice characteristics on user response in an interactive voice response system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
2
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, during our analysis of these calls we found no signs of inhibition like non-disclosure of name and location, or hesitation in recording the message. These results are similar to those obtained by Evans and Kortum [7], where disclosure rates were not affected by prompt gender or personality in an IVR system deployed in a medical setting. As a result, we chose not to explore the impact of prompt gender and familiarity in greater detail.…”
Section: Content Analysis Of Good Callssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…However, during our analysis of these calls we found no signs of inhibition like non-disclosure of name and location, or hesitation in recording the message. These results are similar to those obtained by Evans and Kortum [7], where disclosure rates were not affected by prompt gender or personality in an IVR system deployed in a medical setting. As a result, we chose not to explore the impact of prompt gender and familiarity in greater detail.…”
Section: Content Analysis Of Good Callssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Many studies show that the effect of social presence is stronger in oral interaction than in textual interaction (Nass & Gong, 2000; Sallnäs, 2005). Studies have also shown that users interacting with an interface that uses voice ascribe a personality to it (Evans & Kortum, 2010; Lee & Nass, 2003; Stern, Mullennix, & Yaroslavsky, 2006). Thus, it is reasonable to argue that agents who communicate verbally are perceived as more credible (Lester & Stone, 1997).…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The similarity-attraction effect was also researched by Dahlbäck et al (2007), in which choosing a voice that matches the accent of the user, rather than an accent related to the information being described, led people to view a vocal source as more informative and likeable, overriding any perceived expertise effects. Other research on medical IVR interactions found no effects of either user gender or voice personality conditions on user behaviours such as self-disclosure (Evans & Kortum, 2010), which suggests that manipulating certain voice characteristics may be less impactful in some interaction scenarios than others.…”
Section: System Speech Productionmentioning
confidence: 88%