2017
DOI: 10.1038/srep41750
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of variable commitment in the Naming Game on consensus formation

Abstract: The Naming Game has proven to be an important model of opinion dynamics in complex networks. It is significantly enriched by the introduction of nodes committed to a single opinion. The resulting model is still simple but captures core concepts of opinion dynamics in networks. This model limitation is rigid commitment which never changes. Here we study the effect that making commitment variable has on the dynamics of the system. Committed nodes are assigned a commitment strength, w, defining their willingness … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(23 reference statements)
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Examples include dosage based models of opinion spread [27]. Furthermore, there exist computational models that deal with individuals that are particularly stubborn and difficult to change [28][29][30], similar to the noted population of outliers that would not form an opinion. Finally, future models can be developed using the information gained here; the results showing different thresholds for different data-types, sources, and contexts could be used to build new variants of previously studied models to capture specific facets of social interactions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples include dosage based models of opinion spread [27]. Furthermore, there exist computational models that deal with individuals that are particularly stubborn and difficult to change [28][29][30], similar to the noted population of outliers that would not form an opinion. Finally, future models can be developed using the information gained here; the results showing different thresholds for different data-types, sources, and contexts could be used to build new variants of previously studied models to capture specific facets of social interactions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was introduced in Ref. [527], where the au- thors analyze the impact of the commitment strength defined as the number of subsequent interactions with speakers with opposite opinions needed for the committed agent to change the opinion. This strength is infinity for the traditional committed agents.…”
Section: Before Interaction After Interaction Amentioning
confidence: 99%

Network resilience

Liu,
Li,
Ma
et al. 2020
Preprint
Self Cite
“…We conclude this section by recalling some NG models, introduced to investigate semiotics dynamics in the presence of committed agents [84][85][86][87]. Committed agents are individu-als whose opinion cannot be changed or, in other words, they are immune to others' influence.…”
Section: Other Ng Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%