2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2008.12.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of trust on innovativeness and supply chain performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
187
2
11

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 272 publications
(246 citation statements)
references
References 97 publications
6
187
2
11
Order By: Relevance
“…Mutual trust that issues arising outside the contract parameters allows contracts to be incomplete, since not all scenarios can be accounted for in the contract. Additionally, it has been shown that trust can be effective dynamic in successful relationships (Handfield et al, 2006;Panayides and Lun, 2009). Trust has also been shown to have a positive relationship to innovation (Wang et al, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mutual trust that issues arising outside the contract parameters allows contracts to be incomplete, since not all scenarios can be accounted for in the contract. Additionally, it has been shown that trust can be effective dynamic in successful relationships (Handfield et al, 2006;Panayides and Lun, 2009). Trust has also been shown to have a positive relationship to innovation (Wang et al, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, improvement in performance (e.g., shorten voyage distance to reduce waste of shipping capacity and related operating cost) may be one of the drivers for firms to implement a GSN. The subject of performance has received increasing interest from both academics and policy makers (Panayides and Lun, 2009). Potential benefits gained through pursuing GSPs include decreased fuel cost, waste treatment, and waste discharge.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on these, Table 1 summarises the present methodological profile. Zineldin-Jonsson [2000] x -x x Handfield-Bechtel [2002] x -x x Brashear et al [2003] x -x x Dyer-Chu [2003] x -x x Farrelly-Quester [2003] x -x x Izquierdo-Cillán [2004 ] x -x x Kwon-Suh [2004] x -x x Ryssel-Ritter-Gemünden [2004] x -x x Gounaris [2003] x -x x Leung et al [2005] x -x x Svensson [2005] x -x x Barnes-Naudé-Michell [2005] x -x x Ulaga-Eggert [2006] x -x x Svensson [2006] x -x x x Zhao-Cavusgil [2006] x -x x Caceres-Paparoidamis [2007] x -x x Eriksson-Laan [2007] x -x x Kingshott-Pecotich [2007] x -x x Liu-Luo-Liu [2009] x -x x Nielsen-Nielsen [2009] x -x x Panayides-Lun [2009] x -x x Yeung et al [2009] x -x x Wagner-Eggert-Lindemann [2010] x -x x Davis et al [2011] x -x x Jiang-Henneberg-Naudé [2012] x -x x Source: Gelei-Dobos [2016] p. 672.…”
Section: The Statistical-mathematical Methodology Applied In the Analmentioning
confidence: 99%