2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2004.04.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of treatment for genital cancer on quality of life and body image—results of a prospective longitudinal 10-year study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
78
1
11

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 172 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
5
78
1
11
Order By: Relevance
“…While many cancer patients experience some degree of sexual difficulty (Andersen, 1985), prevalence studies have demonstrated that gynecologic cancer patients, much like men treated for prostate cancer (Bertero, 2001;Jenkins et al, 2004;Schover et al, 2002a, b), undergo early reductions in sexual activity and disrupted responsiveness that can be permanent (Gershenson et al, 2007;Hawighorst-Knapstein et al, 2004;Lindau, Gavrilova, & Anderson, 2007). Studies comparing gynecologic cancer patients to healthy controls/norms have shown that women with gynecologic cancer may resume intercourse, but report diminished sexual responsiveness (Weijmar Schultz, van De Wiel, & Bouma, 1991) and lower sexual satisfaction (Gershenson et al, 2007;Lindau et al, 2007), and are found to have higher rates of sexual dysfunction than healthy women or women with benign gynecologic disease (Andersen, Anderson, & deProsse, 1989a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While many cancer patients experience some degree of sexual difficulty (Andersen, 1985), prevalence studies have demonstrated that gynecologic cancer patients, much like men treated for prostate cancer (Bertero, 2001;Jenkins et al, 2004;Schover et al, 2002a, b), undergo early reductions in sexual activity and disrupted responsiveness that can be permanent (Gershenson et al, 2007;Hawighorst-Knapstein et al, 2004;Lindau, Gavrilova, & Anderson, 2007). Studies comparing gynecologic cancer patients to healthy controls/norms have shown that women with gynecologic cancer may resume intercourse, but report diminished sexual responsiveness (Weijmar Schultz, van De Wiel, & Bouma, 1991) and lower sexual satisfaction (Gershenson et al, 2007;Lindau et al, 2007), and are found to have higher rates of sexual dysfunction than healthy women or women with benign gynecologic disease (Andersen, Anderson, & deProsse, 1989a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies have shown that fear of recurrence and worries regarding family welfare persist over time for CCSs. 3,5,6 The findings of these CCSs studies are difficult to compare because they use different methods of assessment and include survivor groups with different stages of disease and various treatment modalities. Furthermore, most studies have examined the outcome of survivors with FIGO stages Ia-Ib1 CC; 3,9,10 and research-based knowledge concerning women with more advanced, locoregional CC of FIGO stages Ib2-IVa is limited.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, side effects of gynecological cancer treatments such as nausea, vomiting, hair loss, scars and weight changes can cause unfavorable body image in women. 6,8,20,21 In an investigation conducted in Germany by Hawighorst-Knapstein et al 22 it was determined that there was decrease in body image scores and initiative and self-confidence of women following surgery. In a qualitative study conducted on women with gynecological cancer by Stead et al 23 women expressed that they experience apprehension about not to look attractive to their spouses as they were before the illness following medical and surgical treatments, and they would become less attractive as a sexual partner and their sexual life would suffer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%