2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2016.02.070
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of thought disorder on therapeutic alliance and personal recovery in schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder: An exploratory study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
(76 reference statements)
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The present study utilized only baseline and 24-month measures given our interest in examining the relationships between alliance and treatment outcomes controlling for baseline measures. Our decision to examine relationships between alliance and post-treatment (24-month) outcomes rather than between alliance and outcomes during treatment is consistent with primary alliance-outcome work outside of psychosis (Horvath et al, 2011;Horvath & Luborsky, 1993;Krupnick et al, 1996;Martin et al, 2000) as well as the vast majority of alliance-outcome studies within schizophrenia and FEP (e.g., Berry et al, 2016;Cavelti et al, 2016;Dunn et al, 2006;Frank & Gunderson, 1990;Goldsmith et al, 2015;Huddy et al, 2012;Jung et al, 2014;Weiss et al, 2002). Finally, since the present study examined a subset of measures utilized in RAISE ETP, only these measures are described in detail below (refer to Kane et al, 2016 andKane et al, 2015 for more details).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The present study utilized only baseline and 24-month measures given our interest in examining the relationships between alliance and treatment outcomes controlling for baseline measures. Our decision to examine relationships between alliance and post-treatment (24-month) outcomes rather than between alliance and outcomes during treatment is consistent with primary alliance-outcome work outside of psychosis (Horvath et al, 2011;Horvath & Luborsky, 1993;Krupnick et al, 1996;Martin et al, 2000) as well as the vast majority of alliance-outcome studies within schizophrenia and FEP (e.g., Berry et al, 2016;Cavelti et al, 2016;Dunn et al, 2006;Frank & Gunderson, 1990;Goldsmith et al, 2015;Huddy et al, 2012;Jung et al, 2014;Weiss et al, 2002). Finally, since the present study examined a subset of measures utilized in RAISE ETP, only these measures are described in detail below (refer to Kane et al, 2016 andKane et al, 2015 for more details).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Therefore, we expected to replicate previous results and find lower connectedness between words in patients with the schizophrenia diagnosis, in comparison with patients with psychotic symptoms and a diagnosis of bipolar disorder. Given the importance of FTD in defining the nature of psychosis and predicting its clinical (Demjaha et al, 2017) and global functional impact (Cavelti et al, 2016), one must be able to relate such a measure to functional outcome as well as any existing scales for FTD. The measure should also be expected to relate to core cognitive deficits in psychoses such as processing speed (Dickinson et al, 2007), as FTD shows a complex interplay with cognitive impairment (Xu et al, 2014;Nagels et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is problematic since the presence of TD has been associated with poorer work (Racenstein et al, 1999) and social functioning (Bowie et al, 2011;Bowie and Harvey, 2008;Harrow and Marengo, 1986), poorer quality of life (Tan et al, 2014) and high rates of rehospitalisation (Harrow and Marengo, 1986;Wilcox, 1990). TD has also been found to have a negative impact on clinicians" ratings of the therapeutic alliance (Cavelti et al, 2016) a core process in effective cognitive behavioral therapy for psychosis (CBTp;Goldsmith et al, 2015). Moreover, TD has been found to be a significant predictor of future conversion into psychosis in high-risk populations (Bearden et al, 2011;Cannon et al, 2008;DeVylder et al, 2014;Ott et al, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%