2000
DOI: 10.3928/0148-4834-20001101-07
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Impact of the Use of Inquiry-Based Learning as a Teaching Methodology on the Development of Critical Thinking

Abstract: Problem-based learning (PBL) uses patients' problems to develop students' problem-solving and clinical skills. Inquiry-based learning (IBL) was developed as a similar methodology that was more holistic and flexible. This study sought to determine if inquiry-based learning (IBL) enhances critical-thinking ability as measured by the Watson Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal (WGCTA). The WGCTA was administered to 228 nursing students in the first semester and 257 students in the final semester of their program. W… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0
8

Year Published

2002
2002
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
39
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Implementing the model requires adopting activity‐based and student‐centric instructional approaches by teachers such as project‐based learning (Chen & Chen, ), problem‐based learning (Savery, ) and inquiry‐based learning (Magnussen, Ishida & Itano, ). These learner‐centric instructional approaches can enhance the dimensions of the student's control in the following ways: First, they can support the capability dimension through involving students in cognitive activities such as engagement with complex problems and projects and pursuing solutions to them, collecting and analyzing data, drawing conclusions, and creating and presenting artifacts.…”
Section: Requirements For Implementing the Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Implementing the model requires adopting activity‐based and student‐centric instructional approaches by teachers such as project‐based learning (Chen & Chen, ), problem‐based learning (Savery, ) and inquiry‐based learning (Magnussen, Ishida & Itano, ). These learner‐centric instructional approaches can enhance the dimensions of the student's control in the following ways: First, they can support the capability dimension through involving students in cognitive activities such as engagement with complex problems and projects and pursuing solutions to them, collecting and analyzing data, drawing conclusions, and creating and presenting artifacts.…”
Section: Requirements For Implementing the Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In reviewing the literature, it is clear that the evaluation of critical‐thinking skills in nursing is a major difficulty because commercial critical‐thinking instruments are not specific to nursing. Nurse researchers have expressed doubts about the adequacy of instruments such as the Watson‐Glasser Critical Thinking Assessment tool, California Critical Thinking Test and University of North Cardina Greensboro Critical Thinking Skills Evaluation Instrument to assess critical‐thinking outcomes in nursing education and/or practice 73–75 . Alternative forms of evaluation have been suggested, such as the use of concept maps in nursing education, analysis of writing portfolios based on writing assignments that have been carefully designed to foster critical‐thinking skills, or asking nurses to provide documentation of a situation analysis, potential solutions, and sound rationale for the decisions made 11,73,75 …”
Section: Critical Thinking In Nursing Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies have also found IBL to facilitate deep learning (Lee et al, 2012), improve examination performance (Brown, 2010), strengthen learner satisfaction (Hermiz et al, 2011), and encourage higher levels of engagement and interest in the discipline (Meuler, 2008). Looking more broadly to IBL within science contexts, IBL has been found to facilitate the development of critical thinking skills (Inouye and Flannelley, 1998;Magnussen et al, 2000;Holaday and Buckley, 2008), independent problem-solving abilities (Madill et al, 2001), and collaboration abilities (Feletti, 1993;Inouye and Flannelley, 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%