2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.08.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of the definition of preeclampsia on disease diagnosis and outcomes: a retrospective cohort study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
23
0
3

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
4
23
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies of the relationship between PE definitions and outcomes have questioned the value of a broad (vs traditional) definition of PE based on concerns that a low-risk population is being identified by the broad definition, at least at gestational ages preterm. 24,25,27 However, adverse maternal and neonatal outcome rates have been well above the baseline rates, 24,27 similar to our findings, suggesting that the use of a broad definition with uteroplacental function, as defined by EFW, Dopplers, and angiogenic imbalance, is clinically useful. In addition, the independent value of routine maternal laboratory test results and FGR were recently demonstrated 27 ; although the role of headache and visual symptoms was not demonstrated, these have been shown to have prognostic value in the absence of laboratory testing, such as in the self-monitored setting in high-income countries or in low-resource settings where most women and babies die of PE.…”
Section: Comparison With Published Literaturesupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Previous studies of the relationship between PE definitions and outcomes have questioned the value of a broad (vs traditional) definition of PE based on concerns that a low-risk population is being identified by the broad definition, at least at gestational ages preterm. 24,25,27 However, adverse maternal and neonatal outcome rates have been well above the baseline rates, 24,27 similar to our findings, suggesting that the use of a broad definition with uteroplacental function, as defined by EFW, Dopplers, and angiogenic imbalance, is clinically useful. In addition, the independent value of routine maternal laboratory test results and FGR were recently demonstrated 27 ; although the role of headache and visual symptoms was not demonstrated, these have been shown to have prognostic value in the absence of laboratory testing, such as in the self-monitored setting in high-income countries or in low-resource settings where most women and babies die of PE.…”
Section: Comparison With Published Literaturesupporting
confidence: 87%
“…PE is gestational hypertension accompanied by one or more of the following new-onset conditions, on or after 20 weeks of gestation: proteinuria or other maternal organ dysfunction, including acute kidney injury; liver involvement with or without right upper quadrant or epigastric abdominal pain; neurological complications; hematological complications; and uteroplacental dysfunction [ 12 ]. However, implementation of the evolved definitions of PE remains controversial [ 13 ]. As systemic symptoms can occur in PE, a confident diagnosis of PE in women with slightly higher BP is sometimes challenging.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As systemic symptoms can occur in PE, a confident diagnosis of PE in women with slightly higher BP is sometimes challenging. Although edema is not considered a diagnostic criterion [ 12 , 13 ], its appearance in several organs, such as the heart, lung, coelomic cavities, and subcutaneous tissue, primarily induced by increased vascular permeability and cardiac dysfunction, should raise suspicion of PE [ 2 , [5] , [6] , [7] ]. The patient in this case presented with right upper abdominal pain and headache, and while both HELLP syndrome and intracranial hemorrhage were suspected initially, the laboratory tests and brain CT findings did not confirm the presence of either.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cohort was followed till delivery to know the pregnancy outcome. During follow-up, subjects who developed preeclampsia were categorised based on ACOG guidelines (11). For the genetic analysis cord blood was collected post-partum from preeclampsia and from normotensive women.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%