1998
DOI: 10.2307/3551729
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Impact of the CHST on Interprovincial Redistribution in Canada

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since then, however, the provinces have faced federal cutbacks; in 1996-1997 and 1997-1998 the total CHST entitlements were set at $26.9 billion and $25.1 billion respectively. The five-year CHST funding arrangement for the period 1998-1999 to 2002-2003 froze total entitlements at $25.1 billion until the year 2000 after which the aggregate entitlement increased by a GDP-based escalator (Snoddon 1998). The exact percentage of the federal contribution to total health care expenditures in Canada, and the manner in which it is calculated, have been a subject of substantial debate.…”
Section: Canadian Health Care System and The Chstmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since then, however, the provinces have faced federal cutbacks; in 1996-1997 and 1997-1998 the total CHST entitlements were set at $26.9 billion and $25.1 billion respectively. The five-year CHST funding arrangement for the period 1998-1999 to 2002-2003 froze total entitlements at $25.1 billion until the year 2000 after which the aggregate entitlement increased by a GDP-based escalator (Snoddon 1998). The exact percentage of the federal contribution to total health care expenditures in Canada, and the manner in which it is calculated, have been a subject of substantial debate.…”
Section: Canadian Health Care System and The Chstmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some Canadian examples include the effect of matching grants on social assistance expenditures (Baker et al. ), the effect on provincial health and education spending of replacing matching grants with bloc grants for provinces (Coyte and Landon ), the impact of the same shift on the net distribution of revenues across provinces (Snoddon ) and the effect of conditional grants on spending by municipalities (Brett and Tardif ).…”
Section: Intergovernmental Transfersmentioning
confidence: 99%