2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jand.2015.06.381
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Impact of the 2009 Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children Food Package Revisions on Participants: A Systematic Review

Abstract: For the first time since 1980, the US Department of Agriculture Food and Nutrition Service Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) food package policies were revised in 2009 to meet the Institute of Medicine's nutrition recommendations. These changes included increases in fruits, vegetables, whole grains, and low-fat dairy to improve nutrition and health of WIC participants. Our systematic review of the literature assessed the influence that the 2009 WIC food package revis… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
83
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
83
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Using rigorous methods of dietary assessment and a nationally representative sample from NHANES, our study results are consistent with earlier findings from regional studies. 4,10,[12][13][14] It has been shown that WIC participation is associated with better nutrient intake among preschool-aged children compared with their peers who are also from low-income households. [20][21][22] In this analysis, children in WIC households between 2003 and 2008 had a diet quality score that was higher than that of their peers by >2 points.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Using rigorous methods of dietary assessment and a nationally representative sample from NHANES, our study results are consistent with earlier findings from regional studies. 4,10,[12][13][14] It has been shown that WIC participation is associated with better nutrient intake among preschool-aged children compared with their peers who are also from low-income households. [20][21][22] In this analysis, children in WIC households between 2003 and 2008 had a diet quality score that was higher than that of their peers by >2 points.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4][5][6][7][8][9] There has also been evidence regarding positive changes in dietary intake according to regionally based data. 4 Telephone surveys with WIC participants in California 10 and administrative records from millions of WIC visits in the state of New York 11 showed increases in reported consumption of whole-grain foods and decreases in consumption of whole milk, with increased consumption of fruits and vegetables. This shift from whole milk to lower fat milk, with a concomitant decrease in consumption of saturated fats, was also reported in low-income, preschool-aged children in New Mexico.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The success of strategies to improve the neighborhood food environment is likely to be enhanced by policymakers, local residents, advocates, and when possible, the business community working in partnership (Karpyn et al, 2012; Ulmer, Rathert, & Rose, 2012). Evaluation data examining changes in diet and body weight among community members where these initiatives are unfolding will provide critical information to help assess their implications for health and well being of community residents (Chiasson et al, 2013; Schultz et al 2015; Whaley, Ritchie, Spector, & Gomez, 2012). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent review highlighted specific barriers to breastfeeding within the WIC population: lack of social and provider support, return to work and worksite barriers, lactation issues, WIC program and policy issues, and social or cultural hindrances (Hedberg, 2013). Another review studied the effect of the recent 2009 WIC food package revisions on participants’ dietary intake, access to healthy food and beverages, and breastfeeding (Schultz, Byker Shanks, & Houghtaling, 2015). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%