2016
DOI: 10.1177/1090198116644150
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Longitudinal Associations Between Observed and Perceived Neighborhood Food Availability and Body Mass Index in a Multiethnic Urban Sample

Abstract: Introduction Blacks, Hispanics, and women of lower socioeconomic status tend to have a higher risk of obesity. Numerous studies over the past decade examined the role of the neighborhood food environment in body weight. However, few were longitudinal. Purpose This study examined whether multiple measures of neighborhood food availability were associated with body mass index (BMI) over time in a predominately black and Hispanic adult sample living in low to moderate income urban neighborhoods. Methods This … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
31
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our study adds to a still small, but accumulating number of longitudinal studies that have generally found that food outlets have either no effect on BMI or effects that are small in magnitude and not clinically meaningful(4248). Our findings suggest that cross-sectional results should be interpreted with caution and it is unlikely that additional cross-sectional research will provide needed insights into whether geographic accessibility of supermarkets, fast food restaurants, and/or mass merchandisers are promising targets for policy interventions to promote healthier BMI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Our study adds to a still small, but accumulating number of longitudinal studies that have generally found that food outlets have either no effect on BMI or effects that are small in magnitude and not clinically meaningful(4248). Our findings suggest that cross-sectional results should be interpreted with caution and it is unlikely that additional cross-sectional research will provide needed insights into whether geographic accessibility of supermarkets, fast food restaurants, and/or mass merchandisers are promising targets for policy interventions to promote healthier BMI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Thus, although the ratio of fast food outlets to grocers may be similar in urban and rural areas, this lack of acceptable and affordable healthy options may be spurring rural residents, including those with diabetes, to purchase more unhealthy items. In fact, several studies, including some longitudinal studies, have found a positive association between small grocery stores and increased BMI in contrast to either a negative association or no association between supermarket availability and BMI . In addition, the concentration of supermarkets in regional hubs means that rural residents must travel farther distances than their urban counterparts to access healthy foods, which is also made more difficult by the fact that rural areas often lack any public transportation .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zip codes and block groups may capture the food environment near the home, but most residents travel outside of their immediate areas for work and other daily activities and are therefore likely to be impacted by the food environment of neighboring areas. Counties, however, are more likely to capture the majority of their daily routes and, thus, their exposure . Additionally, land use and zoning regulations often occur at the county level, so estimates for smaller units may be harder to apply to any potential policy change discussions .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Factors outside the school setting such as advertising of unhealthy foods (Andreyeva, Kelly, & Harris, 2011), poor neighborhood walkability (Vandegrift & Yoked, 2004), fast food restaurant access (Newman, Howlett, & Burton, 2014), perceived or actual healthy food access (Rundle et al, 2009; Zenk, Mentz, Schulz, Johnson-Lawrence, & Gaines, 2016), and large portion sizes (Pourshahidi, Kerr, McCaffrey, & Livingstone, 2014) impact health, nutrition, physical activity and body weight. Such factors only intensify physiological, hormonal, and metabolic resistance to weight loss (Farias, Cuevas, & Rodriguez, 2011; Müller, Bosy-Westphal, & Heymsfield, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%