2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2013.02.067
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Impact of Temporary Artery Occlusion During Intracranial Aneurysm Surgery on Long-Term Clinical Outcome: Part II. The Patient Who Undergoes Elective Clipping

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
34
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[7] Griessenauer, in two follow-up studies of patients who underwent temporary clipping during treatment of cerebral aneurysms, also found no association between duration of clipping and outcome, even with an average time as high as 19 min. [11,12]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7] Griessenauer, in two follow-up studies of patients who underwent temporary clipping during treatment of cerebral aneurysms, also found no association between duration of clipping and outcome, even with an average time as high as 19 min. [11,12]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Temporary clipping with a mean duration of 19 minutes had no negative influence on clinical outcome. 11,12 It is well known that vasospasm and DCI are the main contributors to poor outcome in aSAH patients. Despite not being investigated in these 2 studies, the lack of effect of temporary clipping on outcome can be seen as a surrogate parameter for a lack of effect of temporary clipping on the incidence of vasospasm and DCI.…”
Section: Does Microsurgery Contribute To Vasospasm?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to temporary clipping, where several minutes of flow arrest are usually achieved, the duration achieved by RVP is shorter. 17 Also in contrast to temporary clipping, the IOM identified no alterations of EEGs, SSEPs, and MEPs, and cerebral oxygenation was also not affected. 2 Additionally, temporary clipping is associated with the risk of vessel wall injury or thromboembolic complications.…”
Section: Why Rvp and Not Temporary Clip Placement Or Revascularization?mentioning
confidence: 86%
“…5,13 Especially in the presence of vessel-wall sclerosis or a prolonged temporary clipping interval, postoperative ischemic deficits may occur. 17 Sometimes the temporary clip itself might limit the application of the permanent clip, especially in narrow surgical corridors. 29 For paraclinoid aneurysms (Fig.…”
Section: Why Rvp and Not Temporary Clip Placement Or Revascularization?mentioning
confidence: 99%