1998
DOI: 10.1097/00000542-199807000-00012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Impact of Systemic Vasoconstrictors on the Cerebral Circulation of Anesthetized Patients 

Abstract: The results of the present study indicate that norepinephrine and phenylephrine do not directly affect intracranial hemodynamics in anesthetized patients, but rather that hemodynamic changes observed with vasoconstrictors reflect the effect of the background anesthetic agents on cerebral pressure autoregulation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
38
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
3
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the increases in CFV during stellate ganglion stimulation were likely the result of increased mean BP augmenting CFV through vessels with impaired autoregulation. Direct intravenous infusions of norepinephrine into both anaesthetized (38) and conscious (24) human patients also do not affect CBF or CVR. Thus it is not clear that inhibition or stimulation of the stellate ganglion affects CBF in humans.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Therefore, the increases in CFV during stellate ganglion stimulation were likely the result of increased mean BP augmenting CFV through vessels with impaired autoregulation. Direct intravenous infusions of norepinephrine into both anaesthetized (38) and conscious (24) human patients also do not affect CBF or CVR. Thus it is not clear that inhibition or stimulation of the stellate ganglion affects CBF in humans.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Clinical and experimental studies indicate that the infusion of low concentrations of noradrenaline (<6 µg·min -1 ) do not affect CBF as long as the bloodbrain-barrier is intact. 26,27 Despite infusion of noradrenaline, MAP was lower in patients receiving 2.0 MAC sevoflurane (group II). However, MAP was still within the autoregulatory range during measurements and differences in ARI between patients anesthetized with S(+)-ketamine/propofol or sevoflurane cannot be explained by differences in MAP.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The purpose of the present study was to reproduce this crucial clinical situation in pediatric emergency care. NE is a potent vasoactive agent with alphaand beta-adrenergic properties that is widely used for the treatment of hypotension secondary to vasodilatation in hemorrhagic or septic shock (16), and that has no effect on cerebrovascular hemodynamics during intact circulation (17). The rationale for NE therapy during hemorrhagic shock is rooted in the fact that NE has been claimed to shift venous blood from unstressed to stressed vascular bed (18).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%