The current data show that the increase of circulating catecholamine concentrations during cerebral ischemia was suppressed with dexmedetomidine. In contrast, dexmedetomidine does not suppress elevation in brain norepinephrine and glutamate concentration associated with cerebral ischemia. This suggests that the neuroprotective effects of dexmedetomidine are not related to inhibition of presynaptic norepinephrine or glutamate release in the brain.
We have investigated the effects of isoflurane and desflurane on neurological outcome in a rat model of incomplete cerebral ischaemia. We studied 40 non-fasted male Sprague-Dawley rats, anaesthetized, intubated and ventilated mechanically with isoflurane and nitrous oxide in oxygen (FlO2 0.3). Arterial and venous catheters were inserted for measurement of arterial pressure, drug administration and blood sampling. A biparietal electroencephalogram (EEG) was recorded continuously using subdermal platinum electrodes. At completion of surgery, administration of isoflurane was discontinued (with the exception of those animals receiving isoflurane as treatment) and rats were allowed an equilibration period of 30 min according to the following procedure: group 1 (n = 10), 66% nitrous oxide in oxygen and fentanyl (bolus 10 micrograms kg-1 i.v. followed by infusion at a rate of 25 micrograms kg-1 h-1); group 2 (n = 10), 1.0 MAC of isoflurane in oxygen (FlO2 0.3) and air; groups 3 and 4 (n = 10 per group), 1.0 MAC or 1.5 MAC of desflurane in oxygen (FlO2 0.3) and air, respectively. Ischaemia was produced by combined unilateral common carotid artery ligation and haemorrhagic hypotension to 35 mm Hg for 30 min. Functional neurological deficit was evaluated for 3 days after cerebral ischaemia. At baseline, brain electrical activity was higher with fentanyl-nitrous oxide, 1.0 MAC of isoflurane and 1.0 MAC of desflurane (groups 1-3) compared with 1.5 MAC of desflurane (group 4). Neurological outcome was improved in isoflurane and desflurane anaesthetized animals (groups 2-4), regardless of the concentration used compared with fentanyl-nitrous oxide anaesthesia (group 1). The increase in plasma epinephrine and norepinephrine concentrations during ischaemia was significantly higher in fentanyl-nitrous oxide anaesthetized animals (group 1) compared with animals who received volatile anaesthetics (groups 2-4). These data suggest that cerebral protection produced by isoflurane and desflurane appears to be related to reduction in sympathetic activity rather than suppression of cerebral metabolic rate.
We have studied the effects of sevoflurane on neurological outcome in a rat model of incomplete cerebral ischaemia. After institutional approval, 30 non-fasted male Sprague-Dawley rats (455-555 g) were anaesthetized, the trachea intubated and the lungs ventilated mechanically with isoflurane and 30% oxygen in air. Catheters were inserted into the right femoral artery, both femoral veins and into the right jugular vein for measurement of arterial pressure, drug administration and blood sampling. At completion of surgery, isoflurane was discontinued and the rats were allowed an equilibration period of 30 min according to the following regimens: group 1 (n = 10) received 70% nitrous oxide in oxygen and fentanyl (bolus 10 micrograms kg-1 i.v.; infusion 25 micrograms kg-1 h-1); group 2 (n = 10) received 1.98 vol% sevoflurane in oxygen and air (FIO2 0.3); group 3 (n = 10) received 1.98 vol% sevoflurane in oxygen and air (FIO2 0.3) and 40% glucose (6 ml kg-1 i.p.) 30 min before ischaemia. Ischaemia was produced by combined unilateral common carotid artery ligation and haemorrhagic hypotension to 35 mm Hg for 30 min. Temperature, arterial blood-gas variables and arterial pH were maintained within the physiological range. Plasma glucose concentration was measured before, during and after ischaemia. Neurological deficit was evaluated for 3 days after ischaemia. Neurological outcome was better in sevoflurane anaesthetized animals, regardless of the plasma glucose concentration, compared with nitrous oxide-fentanyl controls. This indicates that differences in plasma glucose concentrations do not account for the cerebral protection seen with sevoflurane.
Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is used in the treatment of severe psychiatric disorders. It involves the induction of a seizure for therapeutic purposes by the administration of a variable-frequency electrical stimulus via electrodes applied to the scalp. The original application of ECT in non-anaesthetised patients resulted in many traumatic effects and was replaced, in the early 1960s, with a modified ECT regimen that used anaesthesia with neuromuscular blockade. This remains the worldwide standard today. The development of modern ECT devices, with improved impulse modes, has also reduced the incidence of post-interventional cognitive adverse effects. The variety of centrally-acting co-medications administered and the cardiovascular effects occurring during the procedure make patients receiving ECT a challenge for the anaesthetist. The efficacy of ECT depends on the production of adequate seizures; however, the anaesthetic agents commonly used during ECT suppress the generation of convulsions. Therefore, the efficacy of ECT requires knowledge of anaesthetic precepts, understanding of the interaction between anaesthetic drugs and seizure activity, and awareness of the physiological effects of ECT as well as the treatment of those effects. Successful and safe ECT depends on the correct choice of anaesthetic drugs for the individual patient, which have to be chosen with respect to the individual concomitant medication and pre-existing diseases. This review provides information for the optimal selection, set-up and practice of anaesthetic drug treatment in ECT.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.