2009
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1349063
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Impact of Symbolic and Substantive Actions on Environmental Legitimacy

Abstract: Drawing on institutional theory and insights from stakeholder theory and impression management, we empirically analyze the impact of both environmental symbolic polices (participation in voluntary environmental programs, green trademarks, environmental-dedicated board committees, environmental pay policies and community communication) and substantive actions (environmental patents and pollution prevention practices) on environmental legitimacy. We show that (1) symbolic actions have a weaker positive effect on… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
49
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 107 publications
0
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, Berrone et al (2009) confirmed that a firm which does not run CSR maximally will not get any positive advantage of CSR on the firm performance. Madueñoa et al (2015) stated that CSR indicates a very close reciprocal relationship between firm and stakehold ers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 81%
“…In addition, Berrone et al (2009) confirmed that a firm which does not run CSR maximally will not get any positive advantage of CSR on the firm performance. Madueñoa et al (2015) stated that CSR indicates a very close reciprocal relationship between firm and stakehold ers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 81%
“…They find that firms which adopt institutional norms gain legitimacy which lowers their unsystematic stock market risk. Berrone et al (2009) investigate organisational audiences' perceptions of corporate environmental legitimacy.…”
Section: Sociology Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Legitimacy is seen as a status that exists when the value system of the fi rm is congruent with the value system of the larger social system of which the fi rm is a part ( Lindblom, 1994 ). However, being legitimate is an abstract concept because of the numerous actors in the social environment, and hence, given the subjectivity of being legitimate, researchers distinguish symbolic versus substantive legitimacy ( Hybels, 1995 ;Berrone et al , 2009 ). Hybels (1995) states that:…”
Section: Legitimacy Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In appearing as a legitimate organization, a company elaborates rational plans and measures in order to satisfy institutional requirements. The main objective of symbolism is to infl uence the social perceptions of corporate activities in an attempt to obtain legitimacy ( Berrone et al , 2009 ). CVDs could be used as a dialogue between the company and the stakeholders ( Gray et al , 1995a ) to infl uence stakeholders ' perceptions on the company.…”
Section: Legitimacy Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%