The Impact of Surfactant Imbibition and Adsorption for Improving Oil Recovery in the Wolfcamp and Eagle Ford Reservoirs

Abstract

Summary Improving oil recovery from unconventional liquid reservoirs (ULRs) is a major challenge, and knowledge of recovery mechanisms and the interaction of completion-fluid additives with the rock is fundamental in tackling the problem. Fracture-treatment performance and consequent oil recovery can be improved by adding surfactants to stimulation fluids to promote imbibition by wettability alteration and moderate interfacial-tension (IFT) reduction. Also, the extent of surfactant adsorption on the ULR surface during the imbibition of completion fluids is a key factor to consider when designing fracture jobs. The experimental and modeling work presented in this paper focuses on the effectiveness of surfactant additives for improving oil recovery in Wolfcamp and Eagle Ford reservoirs, as well as the extent of surfactant loss by adsorption during the imbibition of surfactant-laden completion fluid. Original rock wettability is determined by contact angle (CA) and zeta potential. Then, distinct types of surfactants—anionic, anionic/nonionic, and cationic—are evaluated to gauge their effectiveness in altering wettability and IFT. Moreover, surfactant-adsorption measurements are performed using ultraviolet/visible (UV/Vis) spectroscopy. Next, the potential for improving oil recovery using surfactant additives in ultralow-permeability Wolfcamp and Eagle Ford shale cores is investigated by spontaneous-imbibition experiments, and computed-tomography (CT) methods are used to determine fluid imbibition in real time. Finally, laboratory data are used in numerical simulations to model laboratory results and to upscale these findings to field scale. The results showed that aqueous solutions with surfactants altered rock wettability from oil-wet and intermediate-wet to water-wet and reduced IFT to moderately low values. In addition, cationic surfactant presented the highest adsorption capacity following a Langmuir-type adsorption profile. Spontaneous-imbibition results showed that aqueous solutions with surfactants had higher imbibition, and were better at recovering oil from shale core compared with water without surfactants, which agrees qualitatively with wettability and IFT alteration. However, rock lithology and surfactant type played a key role in adsorption capacity and oil recovery. Our upscaling result showed that, compared with a well that is not treated with surfactant, a 24% increase in the initial peak oil rate and an 8% increase in the 3-year cumulative oil production were observed. For the results obtained, we can conclude that the addition of surfactants to completion fluids can improve oil recovery by wettability alteration and IFT reduction, maximizing well performance after stimulation from Wolfcamp and Eagle Ford unconventional reservoirs.

Evaluation of an alkali-polymer flooding technique for enhanced oil recovery in Trinidad and Tobago

“…The findings of adsorption and viscosity studies by Coolman et al (2020) supported the findings of Anovitz and Cole (2015), Saleh (2015aSaleh ( , b, 2016 and Alvarez et al (2018) which offered conclusive evidence of the key importance that the pore structure characteristics, morphology and porosity of the soil present in oil wells as well as the type of additive are used to play in determining the physical properties of the system, how they interact with stored fluid in them in terms of absorption characteristics, flow, precipitation and reactions. This study while offering conclusive evidence supporting the findings of these researchers went one step further by offering key data regarding the influence of pH on the adsorption characteristics of xanthan gum.…”

An evaluation of the enhanced oil recovery potential of the xanthan gum and aquagel in a heavy oil reservoir in Trinidad

“…The results of this study offer supporting evidence to previous research conducted by Alvarez et al (2017), who demonstrated that surfactant adsorption depends on the type and composition of the soil as well as the type of additive being used. XRF studies discussed earlier highlighted the compositional differences of both clays where the Valencia clay had a higher quartz and mica content but lower iron content than the Longdenville clay.…”

Polyurethane Foam Reinforced with Fibers Pineaplle Crown Biocomposites for Sorption of Vegetable Oil

“…Regarding pore morphology, there is an ideal fiber addition proportion to increase void content and control morphology. Biocomposites reinforced with fibers 18 mesh (PU/20 % wt) indicated higher porosity with small diameter, which could be an important factor to increase capillary effect and, consequently, increase sorption characteristics [27,28].…”