2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jngse.2021.104394
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of supercritical CO2 on the pore structure and storage capacity of shales

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
36
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
2
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A range of characterization techniques have been used to characterize the pore structure. , Commonly used fluid intrusion methods include low-pressure N 2 adsorption analysis and mercury intrusion (MICP) analysis, but N 2 adsorption analysis cannot detect closed pores, and mercury injection in MICP may damage the pore throat structure. Typical noninvasive techniques are represented by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) , and X-ray diffraction (XRD) techniques, but NMR does not provide pore size distribution, and XRD techniques are more suitable for the qualitative analysis of components without any spatial correlation information. Imaging techniques can describe quantitative information about pore space, such as X-ray computed tomography (X-CT), , which can quantify porosity and the pore size distribution, but X-CT can only scan small core samples.…”
Section: Pore Scale Characteristics During Mineralization Storagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A range of characterization techniques have been used to characterize the pore structure. , Commonly used fluid intrusion methods include low-pressure N 2 adsorption analysis and mercury intrusion (MICP) analysis, but N 2 adsorption analysis cannot detect closed pores, and mercury injection in MICP may damage the pore throat structure. Typical noninvasive techniques are represented by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) , and X-ray diffraction (XRD) techniques, but NMR does not provide pore size distribution, and XRD techniques are more suitable for the qualitative analysis of components without any spatial correlation information. Imaging techniques can describe quantitative information about pore space, such as X-ray computed tomography (X-CT), , which can quantify porosity and the pore size distribution, but X-CT can only scan small core samples.…”
Section: Pore Scale Characteristics During Mineralization Storagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bemani et al (2020) investigated the CO 2 –CH 4 competitive adsorption mechanism in shale using an advanced machine learning tool, considering the pressure, temperature, and TOC. The alteration of the shale pore structure after ScCO 2 treatment is investigated by Fatah et al (2022), and its subsequent influence on CO 2 storage is evaluated. In accordance with the basic isothermal adsorption experiments, CO 2 geological storage potential in coalbed reservoirs is discussed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…65 The solubility form of trapping is safe and effective for storing CO 2 . 141,156 The solubility trapping mechanism i.e., the chemical trapping of CO 2 as a soluble component in brine is supported by the following eq xi to xiv) 58,65,126,142,151,157,158 Governed by Henry's law:…”
Section: Geological Storage Of Sc-comentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dolomite interactions with H + ions reduce the number of carbonate minerals (mainly calcite), leading to their reduction. Carbonate mineral dissolution can result in mineral carbonation, a mechanism trapping CO 2 over geological time scales, enhancing CO 2 storage potential. , …”
Section: Geological Storage Of Sc-co2mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation