2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2006.01.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of stocking density on the welfare of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

15
174
3
5

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 270 publications
(197 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
15
174
3
5
Order By: Relevance
“…However, no mortality was observed in any of the selected stocking densities in our current study. Similar results have been reported for farmed fish cultured with good water quality, e.g., rainbow trout, sea bass, red porgy (Pagrus pagrus), African catfish (Clarias gariepinus), and Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) (Hengsawat et al, 1997;North et al, 2006;Sophie et al 2009;Laizcarrión et al 2012).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…However, no mortality was observed in any of the selected stocking densities in our current study. Similar results have been reported for farmed fish cultured with good water quality, e.g., rainbow trout, sea bass, red porgy (Pagrus pagrus), African catfish (Clarias gariepinus), and Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) (Hengsawat et al, 1997;North et al, 2006;Sophie et al 2009;Laizcarrión et al 2012).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Maeda et al (2010) also observed a reduction (33.39%) on the final weight of fish with increasing stocking density from 700 to 1000 fish/m³ of fingerlings of O. niloticus and Marengoni (2006) found a decrease of 10.92% in the final weight of tilapia when the density increased from 250 to 400 fish/m³ for 135 days. In this context, the lowest growth of fish, grown under high stocking densities may be due to a simple physical limitation in space or due to physiological stress reactions experienced by fish in poor conditions (North et al, 2006). Stock density of 250 fish/m³ achieved a higher weight gain ( Figure 1A), 66% more than in the other two treatments, and daily weight gain 67% over the other two treatments (Table 3).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In many species, this type of dominance can be reduced by increasing the stock rate as seen in works with rainbow trout (North et al, 2006) and African catfish (Hengsawat et al, 1997). These results can be explained by the hypothesis supported by Ellis et al (2002) that a high density condition does not always result in increased fish stress: territorially, fish can reduce its own competitiveness assuming less injurious threat signals when submitted to great densities in stocking, as aggressive behaviors demand high energy cost and sometimes (depending on density) are ineffective.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aliquots of pooled rainbow trout plasma were used as quality controls (QCs) and the intra-and inter-specific assay coefficients of variation were 2.1-3.7 % and 5.5 %, respectively. Cortisol was assayed by radioimmunoassay previously described by Ellis et al (2004) and modified by North et al (2006). Aliquots of pooled rainbow trout plasma were used as quality controls (QCs) and the intraspecific assay coefficients of variation was 4.2 %.…”
Section: Hormonal Assaysmentioning
confidence: 99%