The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.irfa.2021.101751
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of shareholder intervention on overinvestment of free cash flow by overconfident CEOs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The existence of institutional shareholders in the acquirer affects M&A decision in Asia Pacific, as does the trend towards cross-border deals. This is in consistent with the characteristics of institutional shareholders, who have greater ownership than other shareholders, so that they can provide a long-term view of an investment and it is easier to regulate or control management in terms of decision making [14], one of which is M&A decision through voting rights at the GMS. When compared to institutional shareholders in developed countries, such as in US and UK, institutional shareholders in Asia Pacific are relatively smaller [6].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…The existence of institutional shareholders in the acquirer affects M&A decision in Asia Pacific, as does the trend towards cross-border deals. This is in consistent with the characteristics of institutional shareholders, who have greater ownership than other shareholders, so that they can provide a long-term view of an investment and it is easier to regulate or control management in terms of decision making [14], one of which is M&A decision through voting rights at the GMS. When compared to institutional shareholders in developed countries, such as in US and UK, institutional shareholders in Asia Pacific are relatively smaller [6].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…Independent Directors (IND): Independent directors on the company’s board are included as a control variable. Independent directors can play a role in corporate governance and decision-making processes and are thus relevant to the analysis (Kwon et al , 2021; Lassoued and Elmir, 2012).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous personality traits linked to high CEO discretion have been investigated in prior studies, with overconfidence being a prominent one (Souguir, Lassoued and Bouzgarrou, 2023). Overconfident CEOs influence a wide array of firm financial decisions, encompassing areas such as new ventures (Hayward et al, 2006), capital structure (Ben-David et al, 2013), merger and acquisition outcomes (Malmendier and Tate, 2005), innovative behavior (Hirshleifer et al, 2012) and overinvestment (Yu, 2014;Wang et al, 2016;Li et al, 2019;Kwon et al, 2021). Nonetheless, this body of research has paid relatively limited attention to the moderating influence of CEO characteristics, particularly CEO overconfidence.…”
Section: Moderating Effect Of Ceo Overconfidencementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…CEO overconfidence is relatively mature in the study of M&As, although previous works have only done univariate studies. CEO overconfidence is also widely used in other management research, including ambidextrous innovation (Wong et al, 2017), diversification (Andreou et al, 2019), big baths (Pierk, 2021), overinvestment (Kwon et al, 2021), and firm risk (Ali and Tauni, 2021). Many quantitative indicators have been used in the measurement of CEO overconfidence in the literature; for example, CEO shareholding (Malmendier and Tate, 2008), the relative compensation of CEOs (Huang et al, 2011), historical business performance, frequency of CEO M&As (Doukas and Petmezas, 2007), weight of manager personal characteristics (Barber and Odean, 2001), business climate index (Yu et al, 2006), CEO evaluation by mainstream media (Malmendier and Tate, 2008), and earnings forecast bias (Lin et al, 2008).…”
Section: Ceo Overconfidence and Mandasmentioning
confidence: 99%