2017
DOI: 10.1080/23303131.2017.1329175
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Impact of Service System Transformation on Human Service Agencies: Competing Ministry Directives and Strategic Innovative Leadership Adaptations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, this method enabled the researchers to observe the most salient issues related to lived experience-and specifically its consequences for representative bureaucracy-enriched with quotes from the conducted interviews on study participants' otherwise unobtainable views, feelings, and actions that outsiders might assume about this social services sphere (see Charmaz 2006;Hussein et al 2004). The employed methodology follows new and established streams of research in the human service organizations context that have used the multiple case study approach to explore a myriad of questions, such as those related to informal accountability in human service networks (LeRoux et al 2019), the impact of the service system in transforming human service agencies (Vito 2017), and organizational employees' and leaders' perspectives on the effects of undergoing accreditation (Lee 2014). Moreover, a recent meta-review of the representative bureaucracy literature by Bishu and Kennedy (2019) found that qualitative studies of representative bureaucracy are limiting our ability to "uncover how and why representation processes yield outcomes" (p. 23).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, this method enabled the researchers to observe the most salient issues related to lived experience-and specifically its consequences for representative bureaucracy-enriched with quotes from the conducted interviews on study participants' otherwise unobtainable views, feelings, and actions that outsiders might assume about this social services sphere (see Charmaz 2006;Hussein et al 2004). The employed methodology follows new and established streams of research in the human service organizations context that have used the multiple case study approach to explore a myriad of questions, such as those related to informal accountability in human service networks (LeRoux et al 2019), the impact of the service system in transforming human service agencies (Vito 2017), and organizational employees' and leaders' perspectives on the effects of undergoing accreditation (Lee 2014). Moreover, a recent meta-review of the representative bureaucracy literature by Bishu and Kennedy (2019) found that qualitative studies of representative bureaucracy are limiting our ability to "uncover how and why representation processes yield outcomes" (p. 23).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main challenges managers in human service organizations are facing today result from the collision of professional, bureaucratic and market logics, each of which has its own values, principles of governance and accountability, claims to expertise and career paths (e.g. Tonkens, 2008; Freidson, 2001; Van Houten, 2008; Vito, 2017; Colby Peters, 2017; Hart and Buiting, 2012). The customer’s demand is the starting point for market logic.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various scholars, such as Gellis (2001), Ghate et al (2013), Van Leeuwen and Polstra (2015) and Vito (2016, 2017), address the fact that today’s challenges imply new demands on the leadership skills and competences of managers in human service organizations. For managers, skills and knowledge are needed in understanding leadership processes and organizational change.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In non-voluntary service interaction, the simultaneously present bureaucratic logic on one hand, and a customer logic on the other become particularly palpable. Non-voluntary (as well as voluntary public) service interaction can therefore be quite pressing for front-line employees and have an impact on service performance (Korczynski 2008;Fossestøl et al 2015;Vito 2017;Greve, Laegreid, and Rykkja 2018;Jaspers and Steen 2018;Kaluza 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%