Abstract:This research is conducted in order to investigate the relationship between self-leadership skills of health employees and job performance and institutional performance. Methods: The study was carried out in accredited and non-accredited two hospitals in Ankara. The survey prepared within the scope of the research was applied to health employees. A total of 332 (109 from accredited 223 from non-accredited) valid questionnaires were obtained from the survey conducted based on the total number of personnel of th… Show more
“…Engaged and healthy employees do all they can to deliver the best possible service to their clients. Kayral and Dülger (2019) find that, if healthcare professionals are capable of taking the lead, this is associated with positive outcomes related to organizational goals, such as patient safety and efficiency. Besides, healthcare workers who are able to take the lead might inspire their clients to take the lead in their health as well.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Through practicing self-leadership, people might be able to positively influence their motivation and health even if their job autonomy is low ( Lovelace et al, 2007 ; Stewart et al, 2019 ). Within the healthcare literature, there is growing evidence for the potential benefits of self-leadership for the well-being and performance of healthcare professionals (e.g., Jooste and Cairns, 2014 ; Kayral and Dülger, 2019 ; Kim and Kim, 2019 ). Still, self-leadership theory assumes that an autonomy-supportive work context is beneficial for the self-leadership of employees as they are encouraged to actually take up responsibility for their job and increasingly use cognitive and behavioral self-influencing strategies in order to optimize their own motivation and performance ( Stewart et al, 2019 ).…”
Due to the high workload, working within the healthcare industry can be quite demanding. This often results in high rates of absenteeism, unfulfilled vacancies, and voluntary turnover among healthcare workers. We expect that job autonomy is an important resource for work engagement and health of healthcare workers because it satisfies the basic need for autonomy. However, we propose that this relationship between job autonomy and work engagement and health can be explained by self-leadership. Self-leading individuals take initiative and responsibility and are assumed to use self-influencing strategies (e.g., goal setting, self-observation, creating natural rewards) as a way to improve motivation and general well-being. Employees from two healthcare organizations (
N
= 224 and
N
= 113) completed a questionnaire containing measures of job autonomy, work engagement, general health, and self-leadership. The hypothesized model was tested using a series of regressions, and the results confirmed the indirect relationships between job autonomy and work engagement and general health, respectively, through natural rewards strategies. The behavior-focused and cognitive self-leadership strategies were, as mediator, marginally significant: positively for work engagement and negatively for general health. Self-leadership behavior was not related with work engagement and general health. Implications of the findings for theory and practice on healthy healthcare workers are discussed.
“…Engaged and healthy employees do all they can to deliver the best possible service to their clients. Kayral and Dülger (2019) find that, if healthcare professionals are capable of taking the lead, this is associated with positive outcomes related to organizational goals, such as patient safety and efficiency. Besides, healthcare workers who are able to take the lead might inspire their clients to take the lead in their health as well.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Through practicing self-leadership, people might be able to positively influence their motivation and health even if their job autonomy is low ( Lovelace et al, 2007 ; Stewart et al, 2019 ). Within the healthcare literature, there is growing evidence for the potential benefits of self-leadership for the well-being and performance of healthcare professionals (e.g., Jooste and Cairns, 2014 ; Kayral and Dülger, 2019 ; Kim and Kim, 2019 ). Still, self-leadership theory assumes that an autonomy-supportive work context is beneficial for the self-leadership of employees as they are encouraged to actually take up responsibility for their job and increasingly use cognitive and behavioral self-influencing strategies in order to optimize their own motivation and performance ( Stewart et al, 2019 ).…”
Due to the high workload, working within the healthcare industry can be quite demanding. This often results in high rates of absenteeism, unfulfilled vacancies, and voluntary turnover among healthcare workers. We expect that job autonomy is an important resource for work engagement and health of healthcare workers because it satisfies the basic need for autonomy. However, we propose that this relationship between job autonomy and work engagement and health can be explained by self-leadership. Self-leading individuals take initiative and responsibility and are assumed to use self-influencing strategies (e.g., goal setting, self-observation, creating natural rewards) as a way to improve motivation and general well-being. Employees from two healthcare organizations (
N
= 224 and
N
= 113) completed a questionnaire containing measures of job autonomy, work engagement, general health, and self-leadership. The hypothesized model was tested using a series of regressions, and the results confirmed the indirect relationships between job autonomy and work engagement and general health, respectively, through natural rewards strategies. The behavior-focused and cognitive self-leadership strategies were, as mediator, marginally significant: positively for work engagement and negatively for general health. Self-leadership behavior was not related with work engagement and general health. Implications of the findings for theory and practice on healthy healthcare workers are discussed.
“…It is remarkable that studies that focus on increasing positive motivation and positive behaviours of health care workers are rare. Building on the positive psychology movement (Gable & Haidt, 2005; Linley, Joseph, Harrington, & Wood, 2006; Seligman & Csikszentmihalyi, 2000), we propose that interventions should not only focus on reducing stress, but also on increasing self‐leadership of health care workers, as this positively contributes to work engagement, health and performance (Kayral & Dülger, 2019; Van Dorssen‐Boog, De Jong, Veld, & Van Vuuren, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To test both short‐ and long‐term effects of the self‐leadership intervention, while controlling for the organizational influences, we took three measurements. Second, we position the self‐leadership training programme as a positive psychology intervention (Van Woerkom, Bakker, & Leiter, 2019), which provides a novel perspective for improving motivation, health, and performance of health care workers (Jooste & Cairns, 2014; Kayral & Dülger, 2019; Van Dorssen‐Boog et al, 2020). While interventions for health care workers are often focused on developing coping strategies for dealing with the high job demands (Lee et al, 2016; McVicar, 2003; Ruotsalainen et al, 2015), this intervention is explicitly focused on developing work engagement through a self‐leadership training programme.…”
The present study aims to test the impact of a self‐leadership intervention on the work engagement, performance, and health of health care workers. By integrating self‐determination theory and self‐leadership theory, we propose that when employees are trained how they can autonomously influence own cognitions and behaviour, this will impact their work engagement, perceived performance, and general health. To test the hypotheses, a longitudinal field experiment with three measurement waves was conducted (pre‐intervention, immediately after the intervention, and 2 months after the intervention). Health care professionals (n = 195) from five different organizations participated on voluntary basis and were randomly assigned to the intervention or control group. Results show that a self‐leadership training positively impacts work engagement and performance of health care workers. Furthermore, the improved work engagement also mediates the effects of the training on health and performance 2 months later. No direct effect was found on general health. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.
Practitioners points
The self‐leadership intervention facilitates healthcare workers to develop self‐determination and autonomous motivation, which will positively impact their work engagement, health, and performance
Participation in the self‐leadership intervention needs to be based on volition as this will contribute to the intrinsic motivation for actual self‐leadership development through training.
“…Practising self-leadership might influence ward nurses to engage in their work and activate CCOS according to the guidelines set out in the healthcare organisation. There is growing support for the possible advantages of practising self-leadership among nurses ( Kayral & Dulger, 2019 ; Kim & Kim, 2019 ). The purpose of this study was to develop strategies for the facilitation of self-leadership in ward nurses that will enable them to act proactively and promptly in utilising CCOS at a private hospital group in South Africa by investigating the following research questions.…”
Introduction Nurses are responsible for monitoring and providing nursing care to patients. The early detection of a patient who is starting to deteriorate – and the activation of critical care outreach services (CCOS) – can improve patient outcomes. However, the literature indicates that CCOS are underutilised. Self-leadership is a process whereby persons influence their own behaviour. Objective The purpose of this study was to develop strategies for the facilitation of self-leadership in ward nurses that will enable them to act proactively and promptly in utilising CCOS at a private hospital group in South Africa. Methods A sequential exploratory mixed-method research approach was followed to develop strategies for the facilitation of self-leadership in nurses that will enable them to utilise CCOS proactively when a patient starts to deteriorate. An adapted version of Neck and Milliman's self-leadership strategic framework was used as the methodological steps of the study. Results The quantitative analysis extracted eight factors, which were used as the departure point to develop strategies for the facilitation of self-leadership among nurses in a CCOS. Five strategies were developed that related to self-motivation, role models, patient outcome, assistance and guidance from CCOS, and the power of self-confirmation; these strategies aligned with the themes and categories extracted from the qualitative data analysis. Conclusion There is a need for self-leadership among nurses in a CCOS.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.