The impact of resilience on prenatal anxiety and depression among pregnant women in Shanghai

Ma, Xuemei; Wang, Ying; Hu, Hua; Tao, Xuguang Grant; Zhang, Yunhui; Shi, Huijing

doi:10.1016/j.jad.2019.02.058

Cited by 129 publications

(123 citation statements)

References 30 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

102

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The proportion of women having perceived stress, anxiety and depression was higher in this sample compared with previous studies in China using the same measurements and cutoff points. Previous studies included Chinese pregnant women showed the rate of perceived stress was 73.3% [20], 11.3% for anxiety [21,22], and 17.6 % to 25.4% for depression [19,23]. There are strong evidence showing the link between maternal stress, anxiety and depression and a variety of complications and adverse pregnancy and birth outcomes, such as susceptibility to infection, low birth weight, preterm birth, and impaired cognitive development in the offspring [24][25][26].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evidence of accessing antenatal care information via social media platforms supports mental wellbeing in COVID-19 epidemic

Jiang

Jin

Qian

et al. 2020

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evidence of accessing antenatal care information via social media platforms supports mental wellbeing in COVID-19 epidemic

Jiang

Jin

Qian

et al. 2020

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This is a cross-sectional study through a self-administered questionnaire. The anonymous survey questionnaire was designed with four modules to collect data regarding: (1) background demographic, pregnancy and COVID-19 status; (2) attitudes towards COVID-19; (3) anxiety status using the Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS), 24,25 which is widely used and which has been demonstrated to have excellent reliability and validity in pregnancy; 26,27 (4) obstetric decisions, defined as those pertaining to important obstetric procedures. The content of the questionnaire was reviewed and pretested by professors in Psychiatry (XYZ and his colleagues) and Obstetrics (HBQ and XL).…”

Section: Study Design and Participantsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The anxiety status was assessed using the Chinese version of the SAS, 25 and the responses to the scale were summed as a standard score and a degree of anxiety by an established method: 26,27 the scores from 20 items were calculated to obtain a raw score ranging from 20 to 80, and the standard score was calculated using the raw score multiplied by 1.25. A standard score ≥50 indicates anxiety status: standard scores of 50-59, 60-69 and ≥70 were considered mild, moderate and severe anxiety, respectively.…”

Section: Assessment Of Anxiety Statusmentioning

confidence: 99%

Prenatal anxiety and obstetric decisions among pregnant women in Wuhan and Chongqing during the COVID‐19 outbreak: a cross‐sectional study

Liu

Chen

Wang

et al. 2020

BJOG

165

182

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives To investigate the mental status of pregnant women and to determine their obstetric decisions during the COVID‐19 outbreak. Design Cross‐sectional study. Setting Two cities in China––Wuhan (epicentre) and Chongqing (a less affected city). Population A total of 1947 pregnant women. Methods We collected demographic, pregnancy and epidemic information from our pregnant subjects, along with their attitudes towards COVID‐19 (using a self‐constructed five‐point scale). The Self‐Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) was used to assess anxiety status. Obstetric decision‐making was also evaluated. The differences between cities in all of the above factors were compared and the factors that influenced anxiety levels were identified by multivariable analysis. Main outcome measures Anxiety status and its influencing factors. Obstetric decision‐making. Results Differences were observed between cities in some background characteristics and women's attitudes towards COVID‐19 in Wuhan were more extreme. More women in Wuhan felt anxious (24.5 versus 10.4%). Factors that influenced anxiety also included household income, subjective symptom and attitudes. Overall, obstetric decisions also revealed city‐based differences; these decisions mainly concerned hospital preference, time of prenatal care or delivery, mode of delivery and infant feeding. Conclusions The outbreak aggravated prenatal anxiety and the associated factors could be targets for psychological care. In parallel, key obstetric decision‐making changed, emphasising the need for pertinent professional advice. Special support is essential for pregnant mothers during epidemics. Tweetable abstract The COVID‐19 outbreak increased pregnant women's anxiety and affected their decision‐making.

show abstract

“…By contrast, Duko et al [14], reported 21.5% as prevalence after a similar study in Ethiopia. Basing on Life Event Scale for Pregnancy Women (LESPW) to assess stress at 12 -16 weeks of pregnancy and at 32 -36 weeks of pregnancy, 11.1% and 10.3% of expectant mothers developed respectively anxiety and depressive mood in Shanghai MCPC District [15]. The fluctuation of depression prevalences reported in expectant mothers is related to the different tools and the threshold values used.…”

Section: Prevalence Of Depressionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Prevalence and Factors Associated with Anxiety and Depression in Expectant Mothers at Parakou in 2018

Djidonou¹,

Tchegnonsi²,

Ahouandjinou³

et al. 2019

OJPsych

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Anxiety and depressive disorders can disturb the development of pregnancies. The goal was to study the prevalence and factors associated with anxiety and depression in expectant mothers followed in public maternity wards of Parakou in 2018. Population and methods: It was a crosssectional study which consisted in an exhaustive census and a consecutive recruitment of 835 expectant mothers from June 14th to September 14th, 2018. Data collection was realized through interview between the investigator and the respondent basing on a questionnaire in which were integrated Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale-3 (EPDS-3), EPDS and modular Integrated Household Living Conditions Survey (IHLCS-2015) to assess respectively anxiety, depression and expectant mothers' socio-economic level. Results: The prevalences of anxiety and depression were respectively 44.91% and 35.33%. Many factors were associated with anxiety and depression. Low socio-economic level increased 6.7 times the risk of developing anxiety (OR = 6.70; IC 95% [2.83 -13.00]; p = 0.000) and 8.64 times the risk for the onset of depression (OR = 8.64; IC 95% [3.09 -17.18]; p = 0.000). Celibacy increased 2.67 times the risk of developing anxiety (OR = 2.67; IC 95% [1.19 -5.98]; p = 0.000) and 2.18 times the one of depression (OR = 2.18; IC 95% [1.07 -4.40]; p = 0.000). Low economic level and celibacy were the main psychosocial determinants of anxiety and depression in expectant mothers. Conclusion: The implementation of multidisciplinary action program centred on improving purchasing power would reduce the risk of anxiety and depression in expectant mothers.

show abstract

The impact of resilience on prenatal anxiety and depression among pregnant women in Shanghai

Cited by 129 publications

References 30 publications

Evidence of accessing antenatal care information via social media platforms supports mental wellbeing in COVID-19 epidemic

Evidence of accessing antenatal care information via social media platforms supports mental wellbeing in COVID-19 epidemic

Prenatal anxiety and obstetric decisions among pregnant women in Wuhan and Chongqing during the COVID‐19 outbreak: a cross‐sectional study

Prevalence and Factors Associated with Anxiety and Depression in Expectant Mothers at Parakou in 2018

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About