2016
DOI: 10.5194/acp-16-873-2016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of residential combustion emissions on atmospheric aerosol, human health, and climate

Abstract: Abstract. Combustion of fuels in the residential sector for cooking and heating results in the emission of aerosol and aerosol precursors impacting air quality, human health, and climate. Residential emissions are dominated by the combustion of solid fuels. We use a global aerosol microphysics model to simulate the impact of residential fuel combustion on atmospheric aerosol for the year 2000. The model underestimates black carbon (BC) and organic carbon (OC) mass concentrations observed over Asia, Eastern Eur… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

5
95
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 128 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 135 publications
5
95
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Annual emissions of BC from global solid fuel cookstove sector in our study (2.3 Tg C yr −1 ) is approximately 44 % higher than that from the global biofuel emissions (1.6 Tg C yr −1 ) in Kodros et al (2015), which, to some extent, leads to differences in annual mean DRE values together with different optical calculations. The annual mean DRE value from another study by Butt et al (2016) differs from ours in magnitude and sign, and concluded that the annually averaged DRE from residential combustion sources was −5 mW m −2 (Fig. 10).…”
Section: Discussion and Summarycontrasting
confidence: 41%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Annual emissions of BC from global solid fuel cookstove sector in our study (2.3 Tg C yr −1 ) is approximately 44 % higher than that from the global biofuel emissions (1.6 Tg C yr −1 ) in Kodros et al (2015), which, to some extent, leads to differences in annual mean DRE values together with different optical calculations. The annual mean DRE value from another study by Butt et al (2016) differs from ours in magnitude and sign, and concluded that the annually averaged DRE from residential combustion sources was −5 mW m −2 (Fig. 10).…”
Section: Discussion and Summarycontrasting
confidence: 41%
“…The negative effect of DRE in Butt et al (2016) is partially driven by the inclusion of SO 2 emissions (8.9 Tg SO 2 yr −1 ) from commercial coal combustion in the residential sector, leading to the cooling effect of sulfate and organic aerosols outweighing the warming from BC. The AIE in our control simulation is 38 times higher than that from Kodros et al (2015) and over an order of magnitude higher than that from Butt et al (2016). Consistent with our study, Ward et al (2012) also found a large AIE (−1.74 to 1.00 W m −2 ) for carbonaceous aerosols from fires using CESM CAM4-Chem.…”
Section: Discussion and Summarymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations