The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2009
DOI: 10.1007/s10961-009-9132-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of research and technology organizations on firm competitiveness. Measurement and determinants

Abstract: The objective of this work is to evaluate the impact of research and technology organizations (RTO) on firm competitiveness. To this end, we develop a framework that includes strategies to deal with the methodological problems highlighted in the literature. The main features of this framework are the definition and classification of different types of impacts, the estimation of (rough) quantitative measures of them and the development of a multivariate model to explain the different impacts including the tradi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
0
28
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, prior research leads us to anticipate that the character and attitudes of the particular department of the university and even of the single researcher, which (potentially) is engaged in collaboration with SMEs, influence the perception of and experiences with barriers. In continuation of the studies of Arvanitis, Kubli and Woerter () and Barge‐Gil and Modrego (), our fifth and sixth hypotheses are formulated as: Such prior collaborations could ‘demystify’ the SMEs as collaborators for the universities and enhance the possibilities of getting in contact with the SMEs. The line of argument in Hypotheses 5 and 6 is similar to the arguments on the essence of human resources, increasing returns and learning curves presented under the discussion of the barriers of SMEs in Hypotheses 3 and 4.…”
Section: Theoretical Background and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, prior research leads us to anticipate that the character and attitudes of the particular department of the university and even of the single researcher, which (potentially) is engaged in collaboration with SMEs, influence the perception of and experiences with barriers. In continuation of the studies of Arvanitis, Kubli and Woerter () and Barge‐Gil and Modrego (), our fifth and sixth hypotheses are formulated as: Such prior collaborations could ‘demystify’ the SMEs as collaborators for the universities and enhance the possibilities of getting in contact with the SMEs. The line of argument in Hypotheses 5 and 6 is similar to the arguments on the essence of human resources, increasing returns and learning curves presented under the discussion of the barriers of SMEs in Hypotheses 3 and 4.…”
Section: Theoretical Background and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Outcomes may be complex, multidimensional and indirect (Ham and Mowery 1998;Bozeman 2000;Lambrecht and Pirnay 2005), making their measurement in terms of the effects of PRCfirm relationships challenging (Arvanitis et al 2008;Enkel et al 2009;Barge-Gil and Modrego 2010). To account for these features, several authors recommend using multiple measures (Rogers and Bozeman 1997;Bizan 2003;Dyer et al 2007;Jaffe 2008), and especially a combination of subjective and objective indicators (Caloghirou et al 2003).…”
Section: Performance Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Así, en una parte de los estudios existentes hasta el momento es manifiestamente visible la preocupación por el uso de medidas de impacto económico o de valor añadido, cuando en realidad, los efectos de la interacción público-privada son observables en distintos ámbitos de la empresa (Barge-Gil y Modrego, 2011;De Fuentes y Dutrénit, 2012), trascendiendo, por tanto, a esta mirada reduccionista.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified