The Impact of Rapid Population Growth, Expanding Urbanisation, and Other Factors on Development in Sub‐saharan Africa: The Contrasting Responses of Tanzania and Kenya

Abstract

When the nations of Sub‐Saharan Africa won independence some twenty years ago, they faced formidable constraints on development which continue to impede their economic and social progress, despite considerable interim achievements. This article discusses five of these constraints‐internal factors based largely on historical circumstances and the physical environment: (1) underdeveloped human resources; (2) military and political conflict; (3) the colonial institutional heritage; (4) climate and geography; and (5) the twin factors of rapid population growth and expanding urbanisation. However, as an urban sociologist, the author will focus on the fifth development constraint and on the contrasting policies Tanzania and Kenya have devised in response to it. These two countries were chosen because while Tanzania is a low‐income Sub‐Saharan African nation, defined by the World Bank as one with a per capita income of $370 or less, and Kenya is a middle‐income Sub‐Saharan African nation with a per capita income exceeding $370, Tanzania and Kenya are similar in total population, being the fourth and fifth most populous nations in Sub‐Saharan Africa (Nigeria ranks first with a population of 82.6 million; Ethiopia, second, with a population of 30.9 million; Zaire, third, with a population of 27.5 million; Tanzania and Sudan essentially tying for fourth place with populations of 18 million and 17.9 million, respectively; and Kenya, fifth, with a population of 15.3 million, its closest competitors being Uganda with a population of 12.8 million and Ghana with a population of 11.3 million). Moreover, Kenya and Tanzania had the same average annual rate of population growth‐3.4 percent‐between 1970 and 1980, and their projected populations for the year 2000 are only 1 million apart – 34 million and 35 million, respectively. Even more relevant to the theme of this article, however, is the fact that by 1980 Tanzania had reached nearly the same level of urbanisation – 12 percent and 15 percent, respectively, as well as nearly the same concentration of urban population in their capital or primate cities—50 percent and 57 percent, respectively (World Bank, 1983).

Disaster preparedness and response capacity of regional hospitals in Tanzania: a descriptive cross-sectional study

“…Disasters reported were most often caused by large MTCs (87%). This finding is consistent with prior studies, which have shown an increase in MTCs in Tanzania due to rapid urbanization, deficient road conditions and poor adherence to general road safety [ 19 – 21 ].…”

Diabetische Retinopathie und diabetisches Fußsyndrom bei Diabetikern in Kinshasa (Demokratische Republik Kongo)

“…Für diesen dramatischen Zuwachs der Erkrankungsfälle werden primär soziale und Umweltfaktoren verantwortlich gemacht. Die rasante Globalisierung, mit weltweit zunehmender Urbanisierung und Änderung des Lebensstils der Bevölkerung, wirkt sich besonders ungünstig auf diesen Effekt aus [6,7]. Außerdem fördern eine ungesunde Ernährung, mit überwiegend kohlenhydratreicher und fettbelasteter Kost, sowie stark zuckerhaltige Getränke, welche in Ländern, in denen große Armut herrscht, oft preiswert und allerorts zu bekommen sind, die Krankheitsentstehung.…”

“…Während die Prävalenz in Südafrika 12,2 % betrug, fiel sie in Tansania nur etwa halb so hoch, mit 6,8 %, aus. Dabei zeigten sich auch große regionale Unterschiede mit höherer Prä-valenz überwiegend in urbanen Gebieten im Vergleich zu länd-lichen Regionen [4,7,9]. Eine Analyse zur Prävalenzverteilung genese der durch diabetische Neuropathie und der diabetischen Retinopathie induzierenden Mikroangiopathie nur locker miteinander korrelieren.…”