2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0190-7409(01)00134-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of mentoring on academic achievement of at-risk youth

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, much research has investigated mentoring to promote academic achievement, which was deemed its chief goal (e.g. August, Realmuto, Hektner, & Bloomquist, 2001;Grossman & Tierney, 1998;Rhodes et al 2000;Thompson & Kelly-Vance, 2001). Due to its effectiveness, Hamilton and Darling (1989) recommend the implementation of instrumental mentoring that focuses on definite goals such as promoting and teaching cognitive, behavioral and social skills, rather than psychological mentoring that concentrates on personality and emotional development.…”
Section: Teaching and Mentoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, much research has investigated mentoring to promote academic achievement, which was deemed its chief goal (e.g. August, Realmuto, Hektner, & Bloomquist, 2001;Grossman & Tierney, 1998;Rhodes et al 2000;Thompson & Kelly-Vance, 2001). Due to its effectiveness, Hamilton and Darling (1989) recommend the implementation of instrumental mentoring that focuses on definite goals such as promoting and teaching cognitive, behavioral and social skills, rather than psychological mentoring that concentrates on personality and emotional development.…”
Section: Teaching and Mentoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous research in afterschool and education has pointed to the importance of program staff in providing a high quality experience for youth (for example, see Commission on Children at Risk, 2003;Pianta, 1999;Rosenthal & Vandell, 1996;Thompson & Kelly-Vance, 2001). Therefore, it is not surprising that a number of staff characteristics in the MARS study had significant relationships with program quality (see Table 3).…”
Section: Staff Characteristics and Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although mentoring is increasingly viewed as an effective intervention for at-risk youth, there is a clear lack of research on the positive effects of mentoring (Royse 1998); Slicker and Palmer 1993), particularly with regard to the unique needs and experiences of delinquent girls and youth who are non-white and of lower socio-eeonomie status (Sullivan 1996). In addition, many studies suffer from small sample sizes (Thompson and Kelly-Vance 2001). Clearly, it is important to investigate and recognize the potential of mentoring to produce positive outcomes for at-risk youth.…”
Section: Mentoring Programs For System-involved Girlsmentioning
confidence: 99%