2013
DOI: 10.1080/17450101.2012.655976
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Impact of Long-term Scientific Mobility on the Creation of Persistent Knowledge Networks

Abstract: International scientific mobility is a strategic element in the science policies of several countries, being often equated with the development of extensive knowledge networks that can be mobilised by the scientists (and their organisations) upon their return. The objective of this paper is to understand whether and in which conditions mobility leads to the development of knowledge links that are long lasting and effectively play a key role in scientists' activities. In conceptual terms, the influence of mobil… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0
4

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
1
26
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…For junior academics, mobility experience is important to build a career in the job market by providing opportunities to search for more suitable jobs, whereas mobility experience for senior academics relates to establishing more networks, income and reputation (Jung, ; Khattab & Fenton, ; Mahroum, ). These differences highlight the importance of accounting for different mobilities as part of the individual trajectories of academics to better understand the complexity of mobility and its effects on knowledge‐producing activities from an empirical perspective (as argued by Fontes, Videira, and Calapez () and Cañibano et al ()).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For junior academics, mobility experience is important to build a career in the job market by providing opportunities to search for more suitable jobs, whereas mobility experience for senior academics relates to establishing more networks, income and reputation (Jung, ; Khattab & Fenton, ; Mahroum, ). These differences highlight the importance of accounting for different mobilities as part of the individual trajectories of academics to better understand the complexity of mobility and its effects on knowledge‐producing activities from an empirical perspective (as argued by Fontes, Videira, and Calapez () and Cañibano et al ()).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conferences bring together expertise and manifest institutional strengths. They provide a showcase for different institutional takes on the emerging research questions and a marketplace in which individuals can assess who they might wish to work with and where (Fontes et al., ; Henderson, ). Many of the institutional moves identified within our analysis had origins in contacts developed at the IMGS or reputations established at the IMGS.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the analysis of Portuguese scientists who moved abroad and non-Portuguese scientists who move to the country in three different fields (immunology, civil engineering and sociology), the main objective of the project was to investigate how scientific mobility is associated with knowledge circulation, considering its implications for the actors involved and for the organization of scientific production at the country level. Based on the data of this project, Fontes, Videira and Calapez (2012b) highlighted that international networks are relatively more frequent in the case of mobile scientists, although it is necessary to consider the difference between mobility performed during PhD and post-PhD professional mobility. The project also reaffirms the importance of public policies fostering scientific mobility as it can be considered a relevant step to building international scientific networks.…”
Section: Law 29/2012mentioning
confidence: 99%