Abstract:The main responsibilities for the European Higher Education Area are based on processes‘ execution through the knowledge, therefore each institution has to evaluate its own knowledge and organize activities implementing these knowledge goals. Knowledge management (KM) is considered one of the main disciplines of the 21st century, which helps organizations to create a competitive advantage, to identify unique knowledge within the organization and to develop further knowledge creation and integration into activi… Show more
“…HEIs have to offer programmes and projects where students can use their capability to assess and grade the quality of locally available resources and to provide innovative and creative ideas for industries and businesses (Choi et al , 2008; Roger, 2003; Khalili, 2016; Leal Filho, 2020). Although students and teachers belong to the knowledge community (Thomas et al , 2001; Clair, 2003), they have less opportunity to gain practical knowledge to contribute to society (Ashton, 2004; Adhikari, 2010; Thomas et al , 2001; Grybauskienė et al , 2019; Grover and Davenport, 2001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Footing on the work of Probst (1998) and Grybauskien _ e et al (2019), different blocks and statements of KM initiatives can be applied for creating sustainability in HEIs. These blocks contain a statement on whether HEIs teachers and staff know about vision, mission, strategy and objective; whether they can identify, understand and interpret knowledge; whether they can acquire knowledge; whether they engage in the knowledge development process and get support from the institute for this purpose; whether they have opportunity to share acquired knowledge, good practices and the value of personal achievements; whether HEIs have repositories to retain knowledge; evaluating how knowledge is obtained and used in practice, and analysis of teachers' professional activities.…”
Section: Knowledge Management Initiatives For Sustainable Development...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their findings show that the knowledge transfer partnership can be effective in the exchange of knowledge among these stakeholders, resulting in the generation of knowledge for sustainable development. Through organizational activities, HEIs have to build partnerships with stakeholders and society to create a knowledge community where teachers, students, researchers, leaders, unions and employees work together to discover, share and manipulate knowledge and interact with similar other knowledge communities (Thomas et al, 2001;Grybauskien _ e et al, 2019). Elezi (2021) suggests a conceptual framework for the development of HEI partnerships for knowledge development to play civic roles comprising five categories:…”
Section: Knowledge Management Initiatives For Sustainable Development...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their findings show that the knowledge transfer partnership can be effective in the exchange of knowledge among these stakeholders, resulting in the generation of knowledge for sustainable development. Through organizational activities, HEIs have to build partnerships with stakeholders and society to create a knowledge community where teachers, students, researchers, leaders, unions and employees work together to discover, share and manipulate knowledge and interact with similar other knowledge communities (Thomas et al , 2001; Grybauskienė et al , 2019). Elezi (2021) suggests a conceptual framework for the development of HEI partnerships for knowledge development to play civic roles comprising five categories: behavioural constructs of KM such as culture, trust, absorptive capacities and communication;individual institutional constructs to enable HEIs to join the partnership and perform at the highest level;partnership factors to be considered at a strategic level to ensure collaboration with the partners;knowledge activities set to support knowledge transfer across the partners; andcontextual factors such as economic, social and political situations that have a possible influence on knowledge creation and dissemination.…”
Purpose
The purpose of this study is to explore knowledge management (KM) initiatives for achieving sustainable development goal (SDG) 4.7 and to investigate enablers and barriers to insert KM to prepare higher education institutions (HEIs) ready to contribute to SDGs’ performance. At the end, this paper provides a practical perspective of KM initiatives for higher education for sustainable development (HESD).
Design/methodology/approach
This is an exploratory study. It applies a descriptive-interpretative-qualitative approach. The analysis is based on the opinions collected from 170 HEIs’ stakeholders. Discussions among participants have been organized through zoom meetings, telephone interviews and focus group discussions in three phases. In the first phase, a total of 113 informants took part in the discussion on various dates. In the second phase, 10 interviews were conducted with university officials using three open-ended questions; and in the third phase, three focus group discussions were organized to interact about the effectiveness of the Masters in Business Administration in Global Leadership and Management programme and curriculum with teachers, students and the programme initiators.
Findings
From the analysis of stakeholders’ views, it appears that Nepalese HEIs have yet to move forward with integrating KM activities into their aims, structure and functions to address the government’s policy guidelines applicable to maximizing SDG’ performance. A KM cultural framework that values intellectual capital is urgently needed to fill the knowledge-doing gap for the benefit of society. HEIs appear to require multidisciplinary teaching, learning and research methods to play a civic role in society. They have to improve their rules and regulation, develop a boundary-spanning structure from a conventional structure and apply KM initiatives to support achieving SDGs’ performance. Understanding and inculcating these initiatives in the academic programmes could provide a value-adding higher education in the country.
Research limitations/implications
This paper is entirely based on the perspectives of stakeholders in higher education. So, understanding their points of view and perspectives may have resulted in vague explanations. Furthermore, because the setting of Nepal’s HEIs differs from that of developed countries, the results should only be interpreted in Nepalese contexts.
Practical implications
This paper acknowledges the gaps and complexities in Nepalese HEIs from the standpoints of HEIs’ leaders, teachers and students for the application of KM initiatives to reform HEIs, with HESD in consideration, and enhance SDGs’ performance.
Originality/value
To the best of the authors’ knowledge, the paper is the first of its kind in the context of Nepal, exploring KM initiatives for SDGs. It provides a new perspective on KM and comprehends KM initiatives in the case of Nepalese HEIs transformation into HESD for achieving SDG 4.7.
“…HEIs have to offer programmes and projects where students can use their capability to assess and grade the quality of locally available resources and to provide innovative and creative ideas for industries and businesses (Choi et al , 2008; Roger, 2003; Khalili, 2016; Leal Filho, 2020). Although students and teachers belong to the knowledge community (Thomas et al , 2001; Clair, 2003), they have less opportunity to gain practical knowledge to contribute to society (Ashton, 2004; Adhikari, 2010; Thomas et al , 2001; Grybauskienė et al , 2019; Grover and Davenport, 2001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Footing on the work of Probst (1998) and Grybauskien _ e et al (2019), different blocks and statements of KM initiatives can be applied for creating sustainability in HEIs. These blocks contain a statement on whether HEIs teachers and staff know about vision, mission, strategy and objective; whether they can identify, understand and interpret knowledge; whether they can acquire knowledge; whether they engage in the knowledge development process and get support from the institute for this purpose; whether they have opportunity to share acquired knowledge, good practices and the value of personal achievements; whether HEIs have repositories to retain knowledge; evaluating how knowledge is obtained and used in practice, and analysis of teachers' professional activities.…”
Section: Knowledge Management Initiatives For Sustainable Development...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their findings show that the knowledge transfer partnership can be effective in the exchange of knowledge among these stakeholders, resulting in the generation of knowledge for sustainable development. Through organizational activities, HEIs have to build partnerships with stakeholders and society to create a knowledge community where teachers, students, researchers, leaders, unions and employees work together to discover, share and manipulate knowledge and interact with similar other knowledge communities (Thomas et al, 2001;Grybauskien _ e et al, 2019). Elezi (2021) suggests a conceptual framework for the development of HEI partnerships for knowledge development to play civic roles comprising five categories:…”
Section: Knowledge Management Initiatives For Sustainable Development...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their findings show that the knowledge transfer partnership can be effective in the exchange of knowledge among these stakeholders, resulting in the generation of knowledge for sustainable development. Through organizational activities, HEIs have to build partnerships with stakeholders and society to create a knowledge community where teachers, students, researchers, leaders, unions and employees work together to discover, share and manipulate knowledge and interact with similar other knowledge communities (Thomas et al , 2001; Grybauskienė et al , 2019). Elezi (2021) suggests a conceptual framework for the development of HEI partnerships for knowledge development to play civic roles comprising five categories: behavioural constructs of KM such as culture, trust, absorptive capacities and communication;individual institutional constructs to enable HEIs to join the partnership and perform at the highest level;partnership factors to be considered at a strategic level to ensure collaboration with the partners;knowledge activities set to support knowledge transfer across the partners; andcontextual factors such as economic, social and political situations that have a possible influence on knowledge creation and dissemination.…”
Purpose
The purpose of this study is to explore knowledge management (KM) initiatives for achieving sustainable development goal (SDG) 4.7 and to investigate enablers and barriers to insert KM to prepare higher education institutions (HEIs) ready to contribute to SDGs’ performance. At the end, this paper provides a practical perspective of KM initiatives for higher education for sustainable development (HESD).
Design/methodology/approach
This is an exploratory study. It applies a descriptive-interpretative-qualitative approach. The analysis is based on the opinions collected from 170 HEIs’ stakeholders. Discussions among participants have been organized through zoom meetings, telephone interviews and focus group discussions in three phases. In the first phase, a total of 113 informants took part in the discussion on various dates. In the second phase, 10 interviews were conducted with university officials using three open-ended questions; and in the third phase, three focus group discussions were organized to interact about the effectiveness of the Masters in Business Administration in Global Leadership and Management programme and curriculum with teachers, students and the programme initiators.
Findings
From the analysis of stakeholders’ views, it appears that Nepalese HEIs have yet to move forward with integrating KM activities into their aims, structure and functions to address the government’s policy guidelines applicable to maximizing SDG’ performance. A KM cultural framework that values intellectual capital is urgently needed to fill the knowledge-doing gap for the benefit of society. HEIs appear to require multidisciplinary teaching, learning and research methods to play a civic role in society. They have to improve their rules and regulation, develop a boundary-spanning structure from a conventional structure and apply KM initiatives to support achieving SDGs’ performance. Understanding and inculcating these initiatives in the academic programmes could provide a value-adding higher education in the country.
Research limitations/implications
This paper is entirely based on the perspectives of stakeholders in higher education. So, understanding their points of view and perspectives may have resulted in vague explanations. Furthermore, because the setting of Nepal’s HEIs differs from that of developed countries, the results should only be interpreted in Nepalese contexts.
Practical implications
This paper acknowledges the gaps and complexities in Nepalese HEIs from the standpoints of HEIs’ leaders, teachers and students for the application of KM initiatives to reform HEIs, with HESD in consideration, and enhance SDGs’ performance.
Originality/value
To the best of the authors’ knowledge, the paper is the first of its kind in the context of Nepal, exploring KM initiatives for SDGs. It provides a new perspective on KM and comprehends KM initiatives in the case of Nepalese HEIs transformation into HESD for achieving SDG 4.7.
“…In modern globalism, an imitative homeostatic avalanche-like model of crisis degradation of a society, living in line with the principles of consumption, has been formed, threatening by falling intelligence development below the critical mark and consequently by cessation of technological progress and sharp increase of mortality compared to births [3,4]. This presupposes an urgent need to develop an institutional approach in social cognition and social philosophy.…”
Globalization involves the merging of societies and economies (and all their institutions – including educational and scientific) of all countries into a single socio-economic system with the prospect of more effective political coordination among them. There is a need for a new type of social contract between society and citizens, which must necessarily be included in modern institutional systems. This contract manifests itself differently on the basis of different national cultures, so the socio-economic development should be based on intercultural dialogue between different countries, social systems and civic institutions. The internationalization and integration of higher education in the global and international aspect raises many new questions for theory and practice: what patterns, forms, methods of management are universal, and which of them are specific. It is assumed that it is necessary to identify and conceptualize the essential interdependence of systemic and functional characteristics of the institutional dimension of global transformations of world development.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.