The Impact of Job-Demand-Control-Support on Leptin and Ghrelin as Biomarkers of Stress in Emergency Healthcare Workers

Bouillon‐Minois, Jean‐Baptiste; Outrey, Justin; Pereira, Bruno; Adeyemi, Oluwaseun; Sapin, Vincent; Bouvier, Damien; Torgerson, David; Saint-Vincent, Sarah de; Ugbolue, Ukadike C.; Baker, Julien S.; Bagheri, Reza; Schmidt, Jeannot; Trousselard, Marion; Dutheil, Frédéric

doi:10.3390/nu14235009

Cited by 4 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 53 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Physiologically, acute stress leads to increased heart rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and levels of salivary interleukin-1β [ 85 ]. Several stress-related biomarkers are also affected, such as decreased leptin levels, increased ghrelin levels [ 86 ], and elevated salivary levels of α-amylase and dehydroepiandrosterone [ 87 ]. These physiological responses highlight the impact of stress on the body and its potential implications for overall health and well-being.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Coping and Quality of Life Differences between Emergency and Rehabilitation Healthcare Workers

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Audit and Feedback (A&F) is a systematic process involving the collection of data, which are subsequently compared with the established reference standards and then subsequently disseminated to healthcare providers through feedback meetings. This allows continuous improvement to be ensured in the quality of care processes. Often, the parameters taken into account concern only the patient and the treatment processes, neglecting other variables. Quality of life in the workplace and coping skills are determining variables for the clinical performance of all healthcare professionals. For this reason, in this study, these variables were investigated and differences were highlighted in two different role categories and context: cardiovascular emergency and neurological rehabilitation. A psychological screening was carried out by sending the computerized Coping Orientation to Problems Experienced—Nuova Versione Italiana (COPE—NVI) and Professional Quality of Life Scale—5 (ProQoL) questionnaires to all healthcare workers involved. Ninety-five healthcare providers (mean ± SD age: 47 ± 10.4 years; 37.9% male) answered the questionnaire and were assigned into two groups (G1 and G2) based on the ward in which they worked. These were further divided into two subgroups (R1 and R2) based on their role. The obtained results show that avoidance strategies are used more by health professionals working in rehabilitation (G2) wards than in intensive-care units (G1). Moreover, in G1 nurses, physical therapists and speech therapists (R2) obtained higher scores in terms of turning to religion (TR) and compassion satisfaction (CS), while physicians and psychologists (R1) obtained higher scores on the burnout scale (BO). The TR score for R2 was found to be higher, even in G2. The response trend of the two groups in the different departments was analyzed and commented on.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Coping and Quality of Life Differences between Emergency and Rehabilitation Healthcare Workers

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Centrifugation, aliquotage, and conservation of saliva will be achieved at the "Institut de Médecine du Travail, Faculté de Médecine, 28 place Henri Dunant, 63000 Clermont-Ferrand". The following biomarkers will also be measured at the "Institut de Médecine du Travail", using ELISA kits: Cortisol [23][24][25], DHEAS [23,24,26], Leptin [27,28], Ghrelin [28][29][30][31]. The samples will be kept until the end of the study and then they will be destroyed.…”

Section: Biological Assessmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

SOphrology Intervention to Improve WELL-Being in Hospital Staff (SO-WELL): Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial Study

Dutheil

Parreira

Pereira

et al. 2023

IJERPH

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction: Stress at work and psychosocial risks are a major public health problem. Sophrology and neurolinguistic programming (NLP) have demonstrated benefits in terms of mental, physical and social health, both in the general population and in patients, and both in and out of hospital settings. However, these approaches have never been provided at the hospital for the benefit of health professionals at risk of suffering at work. In general, we aim to demonstrate the effectiveness of a hospital sophrology/NLP intervention for health care professionals at risk of stress-related disorders. The secondary objectives are to study (i) within-group, and (ii) between-group): (1) effects on mental, physical, and social health; (2) persistence of effect; (3) relationships between job perception and mental, physical, and social health; (4) intervention success factors (personality and job perception, attendance and practice, other); (5) effects on other stress biomarkers (other measures of autonomic nervous system activity, DHEAS, cortisol, etc.). Methods: Our study will be a randomized controlled prospective study (research involving the human person of type 2). The study will be proposed to any health-care workers (HCW) or any non-HCW (NHCW) from a healthcare institution (such as CHU of Clermont-Ferrand, other hospitals, clinics, retirement homes). Participants will benefit from NLP and sophrology interventions at the hospital. For both groups: (i) heart rate variability, skin conductance and saliva biomarkers will be assessed once a week during the intervention period (6 to 8 sophrology sessions) and once by month for the rest of the time; (ii) the short questionnaire will be collected once a week during the whole protocol (1–2 min); (iii) the long questionnaire will be assessed only 5 times: at baseline (M0), month 1 (M1), month 3 (M3), month 5 (M5) and end of the protocol (M7). Ethics and dissemination: The protocol, information and consent form had received the favorable opinion from the Ethics Committee. Notification of the approval of the Ethics Committee was sent to the study sponsor and the competent authority (ANSM). The study is registered in ClinicalTrials.gov under the identification number NCT05425511 after the French Ethics Committee’s approval. The results will be reported according to the CONSORT guidelines. Strengths and limitations of this study: The psychological questionnaires in this study are self-assessed. It is also possible that responses suffer from variation. For the study, participants need to attend 6 to 8 sophrology sessions and one visit per month for 7 months, which might seem demanding. Therefore, to make sure that participants will complete the protocol, two persons will be fully in charge of the participants’ follow-up.

show abstract

Maternal caregiving stress and metabolic health: Sexual activity as a potential buffer

Park,

Coccia,

Prather

et al. 2024

Psychoneuroendocrinology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Impact of Job-Demand-Control-Support on Leptin and Ghrelin as Biomarkers of Stress in Emergency Healthcare Workers

Cited by 4 publications

References 53 publications

Coping and Quality of Life Differences between Emergency and Rehabilitation Healthcare Workers

Coping and Quality of Life Differences between Emergency and Rehabilitation Healthcare Workers

SOphrology Intervention to Improve WELL-Being in Hospital Staff (SO-WELL): Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial Study

Maternal caregiving stress and metabolic health: Sexual activity as a potential buffer

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About