2015
DOI: 10.1080/19361610.2015.972260
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Impact of Job Attitudes on Private Correctional Staff's Continuance and Affective Organizational Commitment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
17
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
4
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Williams and Hazer (1986) argue that organizational commitment is contingent upon the individual's assessment of perceived interest and suggested that job satisfaction is an antecedent of organizational commitment. Other empirical studies also show similar results (e.g., Kah Loong, 2011;Lambert, Hogan, & Keena, 2015).…”
Section: Job Satisfactionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Williams and Hazer (1986) argue that organizational commitment is contingent upon the individual's assessment of perceived interest and suggested that job satisfaction is an antecedent of organizational commitment. Other empirical studies also show similar results (e.g., Kah Loong, 2011;Lambert, Hogan, & Keena, 2015).…”
Section: Job Satisfactionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Among U.S. correctional staff, job involvement was linked to lower job stress, lower absenteeism, and lower turnover intent (Lambert et al, 2011, 2015; Lambert & Paoline, 2010; Paoline & Lambert, 2012). Furthermore, job involvement was reported to raise job satisfaction, increase organizational commitment, and was associated with greater support for treatment of offenders among U.S. correctional staff (Lambert, 2008; Lambert, Hogan, Barton, & Elechi, 2009; Lambert et al, 2011, 2015; Lambert & Paoline, 2010; Paoline & Lambert, 2012). Studies have also explored how workplace variables are related to job involvement.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As noted earlier, job involvement, job satisfaction, and organizational commitment are seen as important but separate work attitudes (Abdallah et al, 2016; Brooke et al, 1988). Job involvement refers to the bond or psychological identification with the job (Kanungo, 1982a, 1982b; Lambert et al, 2015). Job satisfaction is the degree of emotional pleasure gained from the job (Armstrong et al, 2015; Locke, 1976).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Under continuance commitment, people stay married because of investments made in the marriage and ending the marriage would be too costly. Under affective commitment, the marriage continues because of psychological bonds, common values, and reciprocal positive interactions between the spouses (Lambert, Hogan, & Keena, 2015).…”
Section: Organizational Commitmentmentioning
confidence: 99%