The Impact of Job Applicants' Facial Maturity, Gender, and Academic Achievement on Hiring Recommendations

Abstract

Two studies investigated the impact of job applicants' facial maturity, gender, and achievement level on hiring recommendations. The results revealed that discrimination based on gender and facial appearance varies with the type of job for which an applicant is being considered. Applicants who were babyfaced or female were favored for jobs requiring qualities of warmth and submission, whereas those who were maturefaced or male were favored for jobs requiring qualities of shrewdness and leadership. These hiring preferences were most pronounced for high achieving applicants. They were also paralleled by stereotypical perceptions of the job‐ relevant attributes possessed by the applicants, which suggests that the effects of applicants' gender and facial maturity are mediated by the perceived fit between their assumed attributes and the job requirements. Finally, the jobs for which male and maturefaced applicants were favored were those for which high‐achieving applicants were also favored, which suggests that female and babyfaced applicants are most apt to be discriminated against when applying for higher status jobs.

No Place for a Woman: Evidence for Gender Bias in Evaluations of Presidential Candidates

“…Instead, typical experimental between-participant studies do not ask for comparisons, and participants are given identical information to evaluate with only the gender manipulated, thus holding constant the qualifications and content of the (one) person being evaluated (e.g., Harvey, Marshall-McCaskey, & Johnston, 1998;Huddy & Terkoldsen, 1993b). For example, Zebrowitz, Tenenbaum, and Goldstein (1991) conclude that women applicants faced discrimination when applying for higher status jobs when all else was equal (see also Gallivan, 1991;Steinpreis, Anders, & Ritzke, 1999). These types of absolute judgment studies provide for a strong test of the gender-incongruency hypothesis, because individuals are actually less apt to use stereotype criteria, such as gender role norms, when judging a single candidate compared to judging a group of candidates (Riggle et al, 1992).…”

Juger la recrutabilité des candidats : quels effets de l’apparence et des aptitudes en fonction des types de postes ?

“…Au final, les femmes attrayantes seraient moins bien notées aux postes d'encadrement, en raison du manque de correspondance (Heilman & Saruwatari, 1979 ;Heilman & Stopeck, 1985a, b). Dans cette veine, Zebrowitz, Tenenbaum et Goldstein (1991) (De Bosscher & Desrumaux-Zagrodnicki, 2002 ;Heilman & Saruwatari, 1979 ;Heilman & Stopeck, 1985a).…”

A Qualitative Study of the Recruiting of Men and Women for Sales Positions in Turkey

“…The findings of past research concerning the effects of gender similarity on recruiting and interview outcomes are inconsistent and complex (Graves and Powell 1995). However, research shows that gender and gender role stereotyping can influence hiring decisions (Gallois et al 1993) and/or can impact hiring recommendations (Zebrowitz et al 1991).…”