2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2016.03.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of interfractional anatomical changes on the accumulated dose in carbon ion therapy of pancreatic cancer patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
44
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
3
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2). In particle therapy, changes in gastrointestinal gas can severely affect target dose coverage, as established for carbon ion and proton therapy in earlier studies of our group 17, 27. The observed limited effects of changes in gastrointestinal gas in our current study illustrate the inherent robustness of photon radiation therapy.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2). In particle therapy, changes in gastrointestinal gas can severely affect target dose coverage, as established for carbon ion and proton therapy in earlier studies of our group 17, 27. The observed limited effects of changes in gastrointestinal gas in our current study illustrate the inherent robustness of photon radiation therapy.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…Therefore, using a method previously applied by our group,17, 18 we deformably registered the pCT [Fig. 1(a)] to each CBCT (Velocity, version 3.1, Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA, USA).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kumagai et al [10] pointed out variations on the D95 CTV of 10% due to intra-fractional bowel changes using a passive delivery system, which matches with our results using a single beam in the anterior or lateral direction in the presence of inter-fractional changes. An interesting study of Houweling et al [19] used alternatively the routinely acquired cone-beam CT (CBCT) to assess the inter-fractional changes in the patient anatomy, through dose calculations in a CT, obtained by deformable registration of the planning CT to these CBCTs. This method results in an increase of the available data but the deformable registration adds new uncertainties to the evaluation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Detailed guidance on the delineation of the duodenum has now been published in the recent RTOG upper GI atlas, but the authors of this guideline noted that the fourth part of the duodenum was frequently missed by the contributing clinicians, meaning that existing data relating to this organ may be affected by this inconsistency in anatomical delineation [18]. While the duodenum is less mobile than other parts of the small bowel, large inter-fractional variations in volume still occur and which can lead to significant differences in delivered dosimetry compared to that which is planned [34], [35], [36]. Very few publications have investigated the delivered or accumulated dose to upper GI organs [37], and the data used here rely on planned dose as a surrogate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%