1973
DOI: 10.1080/00221546.1973.11776885
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Impact of Institutional Size and Complexity on Faculty Autonomy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

1977
1977
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The demands and unclear expectations from university and department administrators may lead faculty of color to role conflict, which may cause them to leave their positions (Alexander-Snow & Johnson, 1998). Baldridge et al (1973) defined faculty autonomy as “the ability of professionals to decide work patterns, to actively participate in major academic decision-making, to have work evaluated by professional peers, and to be relatively free of bureaucratic regulations and restrictions” (p. 5). Autonomy in the workplace fosters the need for achievement and accomplishment (A.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The demands and unclear expectations from university and department administrators may lead faculty of color to role conflict, which may cause them to leave their positions (Alexander-Snow & Johnson, 1998). Baldridge et al (1973) defined faculty autonomy as “the ability of professionals to decide work patterns, to actively participate in major academic decision-making, to have work evaluated by professional peers, and to be relatively free of bureaucratic regulations and restrictions” (p. 5). Autonomy in the workplace fosters the need for achievement and accomplishment (A.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Por un lado, la perspectiva sociopolítica del estudio de políticas públicas nos permitirá comprender los cursos de decisiones específicas tomadas por las autoridades estatales, a fin de indagar en la trama sociohistórica de una cuestión pública (Aguilar Villanueva, 1993;Kingdon,1984;Lowi, 1993;Sabatier, 1987;Oszlak y O´Donnell;. Por otro lado, la perspectiva organizacional (Clark, 1983;Krotsch;Baldridge et al, 1973;Acosta Silva, 1998;, orientada a la comprensión del análisis del cambio universitario, brinda elementos para comprender las dinámicas, los conflictos y las tensiones que atraviesan a esta organización compleja. Tomaremos en consideración además aspectos de la perspectiva neoinstitucional (Cox, 1993;Brint y Karabel, 1991;Peters, 2003;Del Castillo Alemán, 2006;Camou, 2007;Varela, 2007) para indagar en la dinámica de las tensiones, negociaciones y acuerdos que desarrollan los actores universitarios en la construcción de estrategias institucionales, en nuestro caso, estrategias de ingreso a la universidad.…”
Section: Introducción 1 El Problema Y Objeto De Estudio De Esta Inveunclassified