2010
DOI: 10.1057/jibs.2010.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of institutional hazards on foreign multinational activity: A contingency perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
163
1
4

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 198 publications
(172 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
3
163
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…We first adopt the widely used Worldwide Governance Indicator (WGI) constructed by Kaufman, Kraay, & Mastruzzi (2009). WGI is widely used in recent studies on the impact of institutions on firms' internationalization decisions (e.g., Cantwell, Dunning, & Lundan, 2010;Gu & Lu, 2011;Slangen & Beugelsdijk, 2010). Among six dimensions of WGI, we use Regulatory quality in our main analyses because it directly captures the soundness of policies and regulations that permit and promote private sector development, including inward FDI (Kaufman, Kraay, & Mastruzzi, 2009).…”
Section: Independent Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We first adopt the widely used Worldwide Governance Indicator (WGI) constructed by Kaufman, Kraay, & Mastruzzi (2009). WGI is widely used in recent studies on the impact of institutions on firms' internationalization decisions (e.g., Cantwell, Dunning, & Lundan, 2010;Gu & Lu, 2011;Slangen & Beugelsdijk, 2010). Among six dimensions of WGI, we use Regulatory quality in our main analyses because it directly captures the soundness of policies and regulations that permit and promote private sector development, including inward FDI (Kaufman, Kraay, & Mastruzzi, 2009).…”
Section: Independent Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Formal institutional distance has therefore not only the more commonly emphasised frictional effects (e.g., Slangen & Beugelsdijk, 2010;Schwens et al, 2011), but also enabling ones (Rugman & Verbeke, 2001). The enabling effect of formal institutions is, in particular, expected to play a role for subsidiaries located in developed countries.…”
Section: Formal Institutional Distance and Intra-organisational Relatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Birkinshaw et al, 1998;Forsgren et al, 2005). The institutional friction literature neglects such external relationships since they are seen as threats to the MNE, for example because of a lack of property rights protection or inefficient contract enforcement mechanisms in countries at a greater formal institutional distance (Henisz & Williamson, 1999;Feinberg & Gupta, 2009;Slangen & Beugelsdijk, 2010).…”
Section: Formal Institutional Distance and Inter-organisational Relatmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations