2014
DOI: 10.5539/ijbm.v9n3p27
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effects of Institutional Distance on Foreign-Owned Subsidiary Development: The Case of the Northwest of England

Abstract: The purpose of this paper is to analyse the effects of institutional distance on foreign-owned subsidiary development. In particular, a distinction between direct and indirect effects of formal and informal institutional distance is proposed and empirically tested. Based on a bespoke census database of all known foreign-owned subsidiaries in the Northwest of England a postal survey has been conducted. The results indicate that informal institutional distance does have a pronounced negative effect on the level … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

5
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This makes this perspective in particular relevant to the international business context in which transactions and company structure are embedded in numerous institutional contexts. NIE bridges therefore the levels of institutions and firms (Martin, 2014;Dahms, 2014). It allows a predictive; economics based perspective on institutions that is in line with broader international business strategy frameworks due to similar underlying and transparent assumptions such as bounded reliability, non-zero contracting costs, and asymmetric information, which are prevalent in internalisation theory (Henisz & Williamson, 1999;Verbeke & Greidanus, 2009).…”
Section: Formal and Informal Institutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…This makes this perspective in particular relevant to the international business context in which transactions and company structure are embedded in numerous institutional contexts. NIE bridges therefore the levels of institutions and firms (Martin, 2014;Dahms, 2014). It allows a predictive; economics based perspective on institutions that is in line with broader international business strategy frameworks due to similar underlying and transparent assumptions such as bounded reliability, non-zero contracting costs, and asymmetric information, which are prevalent in internalisation theory (Henisz & Williamson, 1999;Verbeke & Greidanus, 2009).…”
Section: Formal and Informal Institutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It allows a predictive; economics based perspective on institutions that is in line with broader international business strategy frameworks due to similar underlying and transparent assumptions such as bounded reliability, non-zero contracting costs, and asymmetric information, which are prevalent in internalisation theory (Henisz & Williamson, 1999;Verbeke & Greidanus, 2009). This particular view on institutions makes it possible to understand institutional differences and their potential advantages, such as location-specific advantages in form of abundant inter-firm networks or human capital (Dahms, 2014). In the same time, it leaves enough room to argue for the potential of firm-specific advantage creation and transfers by firms and their subsidiaries through an advanced intra-firm network for instance (Rugman & Verbeke, 2001).…”
Section: Formal and Informal Institutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations