2016
DOI: 10.24081/nijesr.2016.1.0018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Impact of HEIs Policies on the Quality of Education: The Mediating Role of Faculty Motivation

Abstract: The purpose of this paper is to propose a framework that shows succession planning, culture of sharing and a 360 degree feedback at the core of educational institute policies and their impact over faculty motivation and the quality of education by monitoring the students' satisfaction level in the classroom environment. Mediating role of motivated faculty has a great influence over student learning. Extensive review of the literature indicates that a faculty backed by empowering working conditions, colleague s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They believe that faculty development programs have a positive effect on their teaching, enhance their skill, help to control their emotion and strengthen their capacity to perform academic and administrative duties. The finding indicates that FDP enhances the work motivation and in turn helps them in improving their performances, which supports Murphy (2002), Sarkar et al (2015), and Makki et al (2016). When comparing the relative importance of various motives of joining FDP, it should be noted that individual competency motives drive them most which leads to a higher level of motivation and strengthening performances.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…They believe that faculty development programs have a positive effect on their teaching, enhance their skill, help to control their emotion and strengthen their capacity to perform academic and administrative duties. The finding indicates that FDP enhances the work motivation and in turn helps them in improving their performances, which supports Murphy (2002), Sarkar et al (2015), and Makki et al (2016). When comparing the relative importance of various motives of joining FDP, it should be noted that individual competency motives drive them most which leads to a higher level of motivation and strengthening performances.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%