2004
DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00805.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Impact of Group Size and Project Duration on Capstone Design

Abstract: This paper discusses how group size and project duration impact capstone design in terms of learning objectives for the student, value to industry sponsors, and faculty resources. The analysis is based on survey results and an external faculty evaluation comparing a one‐semester offering with a two‐semester offering of capstone design in the School of Industrial and Systems Engineering at the Georgia Institute of Technology. In addition, we examine whether the stated learning objectives (technical writing skil… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
33
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(20 reference statements)
2
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Larger group sizes can lead to difficulties such as free-riding (Griffin, Griffin and Llewellyn, 2004), and students may become frustrated working in poorly constructed teams (Holdsworth, Watty and Davies, 2009, p. 12). The data from students was collected through an initial on-line questionnaire which was issued prior to the commencement of the project, in-depth semi-structured interviews conducted as it neared completion, and a final on-line questionnaire which was administered after the submission of the report by the students.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Larger group sizes can lead to difficulties such as free-riding (Griffin, Griffin and Llewellyn, 2004), and students may become frustrated working in poorly constructed teams (Holdsworth, Watty and Davies, 2009, p. 12). The data from students was collected through an initial on-line questionnaire which was issued prior to the commencement of the project, in-depth semi-structured interviews conducted as it neared completion, and a final on-line questionnaire which was administered after the submission of the report by the students.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research indicates this group size is optimal since it is small enough to discourage social loafing yet large enough for representation of multiple perspectives and abilities (Aggarwal & O'Brien, 2008;Griffin, Griffin, & Llewellyn, 2004). Compared to groups with 7-10 members, students report greater satisfaction and better learning outcomes in such smaller-sized groups (Griffin et al, 2004). Each task had 1-2 pages of guidelines that included a directive to view examples of successful tasks from previous semesters posted in an online portal.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…as mentors for faculty-developed projects 24 and both students and sponsors prefer a onesemester course 25 . Studies have shown that multiple types of industry participation and feedback all can provide a positive value to both students and departments.…”
Section: Lessons From Capstone Industry Projectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Including industry in student engineering design courses requires more faculty time to coordinate projects and poses challenges to identifying appropriate projects. Because of these challenges, some programs chose only to involve industry members Page 26.1412.4as mentors for faculty-developed projects 24 and both students and sponsors prefer a onesemester course 25 . Studies have shown that multiple types of industry participation and feedback all can provide a positive value to both students and departments.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%