2013
DOI: 10.1596/1813-9450-6532
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Impact of Government Support on Firm R&D Investments: A Meta-Analysis

Abstract: The Policy Research Working Paper Series disseminates the findings of work in progress to encourage the exchange of ideas about development issues. An objective of the series is to get the findings out quickly, even if the presentations are less than fully polished. The papers carry the names of the authors and should be cited accordingly. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this paper are entirely those of the authors. They do not necessarily represent the views of the International Ba… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(32 reference statements)
0
2
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The literature shows a positive association between tax incentives and R&D intensity (Busom, Corchuelo, and Martínez-Ros 2012). Tax credits seem to have the most impact on larger firms without financing constraints, whereas direct grants are most effective at influencing small and medium enterprises and firms with no previous R&D experience (Correa, Andres, and Borja-Vega 2013;Correa and Guceri 2013). As for incentives related to workforce training, a mix of tax incentives and grants targeted to specific groups of enterprises or employees appears to be more appropriate than a single incentive for a large number of companies (Müller and Behringer 2012).…”
Section: Behavioral Incentives Aim To Generate Positive Externalities By Stimulating Specificmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature shows a positive association between tax incentives and R&D intensity (Busom, Corchuelo, and Martínez-Ros 2012). Tax credits seem to have the most impact on larger firms without financing constraints, whereas direct grants are most effective at influencing small and medium enterprises and firms with no previous R&D experience (Correa, Andres, and Borja-Vega 2013;Correa and Guceri 2013). As for incentives related to workforce training, a mix of tax incentives and grants targeted to specific groups of enterprises or employees appears to be more appropriate than a single incentive for a large number of companies (Müller and Behringer 2012).…”
Section: Behavioral Incentives Aim To Generate Positive Externalities By Stimulating Specificmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, most of the studies listed above use very similar counterfactual designs and are in fact not substantially different. What can truly be a source of great difference in the results is the heterogeneity in R&D policies among the states, as Correa et al [56] mention. As the R&D policies differ, their impact differs as well.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…В другой метаработе на основе 34 публикаций (F. Castellacci, C. Mee Lie [14]) также было выявлено положительное влияние налоговых кредитов на проведение фирмами НИОКР, однако отмечалось, что наибольший положительный эффект на инновационную активность инвестиционные налоговые кредиты имеют в случае мелких предприятий, организаций, работающих в сфере предоставления услуг, и в странах с низким уровнем технологического развития. В исследовании P. Correa et al [15] на основании метаанализа 37 публикаций был выявлен существенный эффект прямой государственной поддержки, но при этом отмечалась неоднородность результатов по странам, отраслям и используемым методам оценки. А в работе C. Dimos, G. Pugh [16], посвященной анализу эффективности финансовой поддержки НИОКР, на основании изучения 52 публикаций авторы пришли к неожиданному выводу об отсутствии существенных положительных эффектов от государственного стимулирования НИОКР.…”
Section: прямые субсидии более эффективны?unclassified