2010
DOI: 10.1080/02642060802626857
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of entry modes on the organisational design of international hotel chains

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(30 reference statements)
0
11
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Many researchers have suggested that entry modes may be differentiated according to the level of control (Anderson and Gatignon 1986;Hill et al 1990), as this is a key consideration within international strategies (Brookes and Roper 2011). Control is defined as the ability of the firm to influence the various management systems of the organization in order to improve its competitive position and maximize returns on firm-specific assets (Agarwal and Ramaswami 1992).…”
Section: Entry Modesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many researchers have suggested that entry modes may be differentiated according to the level of control (Anderson and Gatignon 1986;Hill et al 1990), as this is a key consideration within international strategies (Brookes and Roper 2011). Control is defined as the ability of the firm to influence the various management systems of the organization in order to improve its competitive position and maximize returns on firm-specific assets (Agarwal and Ramaswami 1992).…”
Section: Entry Modesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many researchers have suggested that entry modes may be differentiated according to level of control (Aliouche and Schlentrich, 2011; Haro et al, 2014; Pla-Barber et al, 2010), as this is a key consideration within international strategies (Brookes and Roper, 2011). Control is defined as the firm’s ability to influence the various management systems of the organization in order to improve its competitive position and maximize returns on firm-specific assets (Agarwal and Ramaswami, 1992).…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An important aspect to bear in mind when a firm internationalizes is the way it enters the foreign markets and it wishes to serve (Brookes and Roper, 2011; Haro et al, 2014; Pillmayer and Scherle, 2014; Pla-Barber et al, 2010, 2011). The range of possibilities is wide and varied, and various formulas are available depending on which parameters the firm considers to be most important.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because it is unique and difficult to transfer, tacit knowledge is more intangible and thus an important source of competitive advantage. Tacit knowledge is linked to context and because it is location dependent, independently operated new entrants may be better able to adapt to local needs and build more organic and less rigid operating structures than franchised new entrants (Levinthal and March 1993;Brookes and Roper 2010). Combining the flexibility of open external knowledge sourcing with the difficulty of imitation of tacit knowledge, entry to new markets as an independent entrepreneur may yield higher post-entry performance than lock-in with a brand affiliation.…”
Section: Tacit Knowledge Open Innovation and The Independent Entreprmentioning
confidence: 99%