2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2014.02.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of enterprise risk management on the marginal cost of reducing risk: Evidence from the insurance industry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
57
0
5

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
4
57
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Another study measuring ERM by word search similarly shows that firms experienced increasing operating profits per unit of risk and a reduction in stock volatility after ERM adoption (Eckles et al, 2014). as a proxy for ERM sophistication.…”
Section: A Current Stance On the Enterprise Risk Management Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another study measuring ERM by word search similarly shows that firms experienced increasing operating profits per unit of risk and a reduction in stock volatility after ERM adoption (Eckles et al, 2014). as a proxy for ERM sophistication.…”
Section: A Current Stance On the Enterprise Risk Management Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A few studies have shown a positive relationship (Eckles, Hoyt, and Miller, 2014;Grace, Leverty, Phillips, and Shimpi, 2014;, others find no beneficial effects (Pagach and Warr, 2010;Quon, Zeghal, and Maingot, 2012;Sekerci, 2012), while Lin, Wen, and Yu (2011) show that it erodes firm value. Such inconsistencies raise questions about whether the anticipated beneficial effects of ERM can be realized.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It requires a significant change in the risk management philosophy, culture, business strategy, and internal processes, and technology (Arena et al, 2010;Eckles et al, 2011). This involves direct costs, such as, the cost of acquiring new technology, consultancy cost, training and reorientation cost, and indirect cost such as cost of production or service distraction and change in strategic focus, among others (Dafikpaku, 2011).…”
Section: Erm and Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This involves direct costs, such as, the cost of acquiring new technology, consultancy cost, training and reorientation cost, and indirect cost such as cost of production or service distraction and change in strategic focus, among others (Dafikpaku, 2011). Also worth mentioning is that, with a firm's investment in ERM implementation, it takes a longer time for the expected benefits to be fully realized, so the immediate benefits of the implementation may not be easily measured in the short term (Pagach et al, 2010;Eckles et al, 2011).…”
Section: Erm and Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation